I realize they are not supported, but the custom ISY994 is forked.
I downloaded 109 and rebooted, and said it couldn’t setup ISY994. No update for custom component in HACS.
Previously when I did the custom integration I had nothing in my configuration.yaml. I removed it from HACS. Removed it from Integrations. I then tried to add it back in. It loads fine from HACS, but once you go to Integrations and try to add it. You click on it, and it just goes back to the menu of available Integrations.
For now I added it via the standard method and it’s back in my yaml, but I am missing some things. Some of my devices are missing attributes. Specifically for me my battery states of my locks is gone. I saw the developer of the custom component has .109 revision in pre-release.
This is a heads up for all those using the custom component for ISY994 is all.
I have some covers integrated with tuya. After the update only 1 (out 5) of my covers although HA can find it, it is not working. It’s working ok with tuya app although. I already delete configuration in HA and reinstall it, I logged off from tuya app and reconnected but it is still unavailable.
No problem in log files. I also tried with incognito mode in but again the same.
Any ideas whats wrong?
Others with tuya have any problems?
It’s the first one below with the grayed arrows
with 0.109 update when my covers are half opened (state unknown) the up and down arrows are grayed and I can not handle them through HA. If the are totally opened or closed I can.
Can someone tell me how I can roll back in 0.108.9?
I have home assistant (hassio) in a NUC.
After upgrade, Onkyo platform failed to start. Anybody having the same issue?
homeassistant.components.media_player
Source: components/onkyo/media_player.py:207
Integration: Media player ([documentation](https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/media_player), [issues](https://github.com/home-assistant/home-assistant/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22integration%3A+media_player%22))
First occurred: 8:14:32 AM (1 occurrences)
Last logged: 8:14:32 AM
Error while setting up onkyo platform for media_player
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/src/homeassistant/homeassistant/helpers/entity_platform.py", line 178, in _async_setup_platform await asyncio.wait_for(asyncio.shield(task), SLOW_SETUP_MAX_WAIT) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/asyncio/tasks.py", line 442, in wait_for return fut.result() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/concurrent/futures/thread.py", line 57, in run result = self.fn(*self.args, **self.kwargs) File "/usr/src/homeassistant/homeassistant/components/onkyo/media_player.py", line 207, in setup_platform for receiver in eISCP.discover(): File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/eiscp/core.py", line 318, in discover ifaddrs=netifaces.ifaddresses(interface) ValueError: You must specify a valid interface name.
More significantly I have had a HA Hell day. Updated to 0.109 (docker core on 64 bit ubuntu).
Just wouldn’t start, I mean it was generating logs, but no UI. Lots of weird errors in log. Usually I am posting “perfect update once again” - but not this time!
I know I should have followed my own advice and saved the logs for reporting errors, but I restarted so many times…
I went back and forward between 0.108.x and 0.109.
In the end I commented out most of configuration.yaml. An awful lot of it was kinda legacy and had been overtaken by UI configuration. Then it started. Pleased, as I like to keep up. I’ll uncomment stuff that is still relevant bit by bit and see where the error lies.
I’m realy sorry to say this, but for me the new integration site has become quite confusing, at least on mobile devices. Due to the new card reprentation it wastes imho a lot of space. This seems more like a decision for “design over functionality” to me
Ok … One of the things I really dislike about pushing everything towards the integrations and away from the config; is the fact that I have to open and edit the core.config_entries whenever I need to update a setting …
For example; when you add an integration you get settings like this:
yes it did, depending on your weather integration.
I’ve long ago tried to start a discussion about that, but it was never picked up. Installed another weather integration to be sure it wasn’t sunny at night
