Devices supporting EU Long Range

Hello,
I have just tried out a zooz zac93 with firmware 1.5. It seems to be possible to activate Long Range for the EU here. With 1.6 (SDK 7.23.2) the final version should finally be available.
Are there already any devices that support EU Long Range, or is it known whether there will be firmware updates for the 800 series at least?
I have asked several manufacturers. Zoos replied and confirmed that they will equip their 800 devices with EU LR. This can hopefully be done via OTA, but will still take some time.

grafik

Greetings Oliver

P.S. A Razberry 7 pro (external antenna - 700 series) has an approx. 10 db better background RSSI than the ZAC93. I will therefore try to add an external antenna .

Today I’ve included my first Z- Wave EU LR device. It’s a Shelly H&T Sensor (QLHT-OU2Z).
Shelly seems to be the first company to offer various LR devices.

The first tests are simply outstanding. The range has been massively increased compared to standard Z-Wave Plus devices. My controller (Zooz ZAC93 with external antenna) is located in the center of the house. Even 4-5 solid concrete walls across floors are no longer a problem. The signal was still received about 150m outside the house.
Now I urgently need plug sockets with Z-Wave LR. I would prefer a firmware update for the Zooz ZEN15 plug :wink:

I really think this could give Z-Wave in Europe a boost, as it means that radio problems are a thing of the past.

2 Likes

The newest (at the moment) 7 devices on this page are EU LR. I just got my Wave mini 1PM. The full-size Wave 1PM is coming in December, they tell me

Since yesterday, I have had two Shelly Wave Plug S LR QNPL-0A112 devices. They work (nearly) as expected. LongRange Inclusion was super easy, both directly from HA and via z-wave js ui.
The range is also better, of course, compared to the device (Zooz ZEN15 in mesh mode) with the best range that I have been able to test so far. However, I don’t think that these LR plugs alone will get you further than a mesh with 1-2 hops, at least not in my building.
So now I’m waiting for the LR version of the Zen15. Due to its design, this plug appears to be equipped with a significantly better antenna.

I use a ZWA-2 with the following RSSI values

 channel 0: -113 dBm
 channel 1: -116 dBm
 channel 2: -116 dBm
 channel 3: -107 dBm
1 Like

has anybody come across LR contact sensors?

I would like to share my latest experiences with the Shelly Plug LR. After various tests.
I unfortunately have to conclude that the range of the plug in LR mode is only as far as a Zooz ZEN15 in mesh mode. Since the same chip is used, this is probably due to the antenna in the external housing of the Zooz Power Plug.

However, it reaches significantly further than a Fibaro FGWP102, Qubino Smart Plug, or an Aeotec Smart Switch 7. This makes it the best plug in a compact form I’ve ever tested. However, it will not reach further than a mesh in 2 hops, at least not in my building.

Nevertheless, I can hardly wait for the LR update for the ZEN15. This should then show what is possible with LR in the EU.

Another note for all Shelly 1PM mini (LR) owners. Today there was a firmware update due to a small bug. Since this (LR) version was stored in the same folder as the non-LR version, it can be assumed that existing (non-LR) devices can be updated to LR with this. Perhaps somebody will try.

1PM mini (LR) FW Update

Regards, Oliver

1 Like

If I understand correctly, there is a firmware update for the Zooz ZSE41. This should activate EU LR for the sensor.

Otherwise, I am not aware of any other sensors.

ZSE41 Open | Close Sensor Change Log

An update for the ZEN17 Universal Relay also seems to be available.

ZEN17 Universal Relay Change Log

Hi, sorry for Offtopic.
I have also an Zooz ZAC93 GPIO Module.

@memphi2 you mentioned an external antenna.
Could you please show me a picture of it?
I’m interested how it’s look like.
Is it worth it to add the antenna?
Did this mod give you some improvements?

Hi,
have a look here: https://github.com/zwave-js/zwave-js/discussions/7717

1 Like

Hello,

currently I’m testing the new Aeotec ZWA050 Smoke Shield.

The reception is just insanely good.
There isn’t a single spot in my solidly built house where the reception doesn’t work perfectly.
So I went outside for a moment. The reception was still possible in combination with a ZWA-2 in the middle of the building at a distance of 370 meters, including other buildings in between.

Best regards, Olli

Personally, I stick with non–long-range sensors in the house, specifically to maintain a mesh network. The more mesh-capable sensors you remove, the worse the Z-Wave network becomes… (of course, this only applies to sensors with repeater functionality, meaning those that are powered).

The advantage of long-range would only really come into play if you exceed the distance covered by the mesh network.

But ideally, in my opinion, the best setup is a network built on a strong mesh foundation.

Also, the price of long-range devices is quite high, and there are still many missing options in LR—like thermostats that attach directly to radiators. Zooz 800 had something listed on Amazon, but the reviews were pretty bad and it was eventually removed.

In my case, only one of the 30 sensors is powered, the rest are battery-operated. LR definitely makes sense for all battery-operated devices, e.g. because of the battery life.
In the specific case of the smoke detector, it is located two floors away and separated by at least five concrete walls. This could not be done via a mesh network. I had a second network in the basement for this purpose.
I operate powered devices in mesh mode as far as possible, but even here I have three plugs that were difficult or impossible to reach via mesh. That’s where I use LR. This has no negative impact on the stability of the mesh. On the contrary, the network becomes more stable and the overall response faster when distant devices with few hops do not block the mesh network.

So it always depends on the individual situation, but especially in Europe, LR helps in many situations. However, there are still < 20 devices that support EU LR. That’s why I’m testing them, especially for range.
They don’t cost any more than non-LR devices, and some manufacturers are also releasing firmware updates to make 800 series devices LR-capable. That’s why I think the situation is great. No one has to use LR, but it offers a range that is otherwise unattainable compared to Mesh Z-Wave, Zigbee, or Matter.

Best regards, Oliver

i’m considering the Aeotec ZWA050 Smoke Shield.

Do I understand correctly it is compatible with the Ei650W and the Ei650iW and none of the others of that series of smoke detectors?

And that after 10 years I have to replace the smoke detector (battery will be dead and in any case the sensor is not rated for more than 10 years); and it is unlikely that at that moment there will still be a smoke detector on the market that is compatible with the Aeotec ZWA050 Smoke Shield?

I have not yet invested in a LR compatible stick, but if I get it right, the Aeotec ZWA050 Smoke Shield should be backwards compatible so I can ā€˜upgrade’ later?

Thanks!

You are right, currently only the Ei650W and Ei650iW are supported. But I’m confident the there will be compatible Ei smoke detectors availible for a long time, because their standard port is used to connect the shield.
I bought a set with a Ei60iW and I have to say, that is a really high quality device.
I will replace one or two older Fibaros with this combination of aeotec shield and Ei smoke detector.

And yes, you can include it in your mesh network. If you want to switch to LR (makes always sense for every battery device, because it increases the life of the batteries) you have to exclude the device, switch your smart start entry to LR and then re-include it.

@memphi2, what firmware version does your Shelly plugs have? I’ve upgraded to 11.04, but I can’t get them included as LR devices.

Hi,

FW 11.4.0/SDk 7.23.1 is installed on my plugs.


Did you change the smart start entry to LR? Did you activate it and is the device encluded?

You wrote, that you updated the pulg, so I assume it is the white Shelly plug S, not the black one?

Hi @memphi2

It makes sense that the mesh isn’t working well in your case. If there’s only one device acting as a repeater and it’s not mains-powered, the network can’t really take advantage of the mesh concept. The whole point of Z-Wave is to create a reliable mesh with multiple sensors and actuators that also serve as repeaters.

That’s why the performance is poor with your current setup and why long-range seems necessary here. For example, if you were controlling all your electric shutters with Z-Wave devices that are always powered, you’d already have a much stronger mesh. Adding smart plugs would also help.

Reviews confirm the same thing: 800LR isn’t always efficient on battery because it operates outside the mesh and has to connect directly to the controller. I’m in Europe too, and I don’t really see why LR would be better here compared to a proper mesh setup.

I’m sorry, but my mesh works perfect.
Nevertheless, the distance to the basement is too great. And no, I can’t add any more mains-powered devices to the 60 I already have, because I don’t own the floors in between. Devices with one or more hops always have greater latency than a directly connected device. So even if it were possible, I would still run battery-powered devices in LR mode. Simply because a mesh can never be better than a direct connection.
The goal must always be for all devices , to communicate directly with the controller. With the help of LR, this is now the case for me. It couldn’t be better or more reliable; every device always responds immediately, and even multicasts with 20 devices are no problem.

As for battery life, only LR mode has any battery-saving function at all. According to my preliminary tests, batteries last 2-3 times longer in LR mode, not the other way around.
That’s exactly why I don’t rely on reviews or anything like that. I prefer to test things out for myself :slight_smile:

@markruys Just got one of those white Shelly Wave Plug S, and updated it to the current firmware/SDK. It seems to be exactly the same to the black ones(11.4/7.23.1). But it is not!

Both plugs have the same 800 series chip, but only the black one sends a LR Smart Start request.

It looks like this:

[REQ] [ApplicationUpdateRequest]
type: SmartStart_LongRange_HomeId_Received
remote node ID: 0
NWI home ID: 0xfbxxxxxx
basic device class: End Node
generic device class: 16
specific device class: 0
supported CCs:
Ā· Z-Wave Plus Info
Ā· Security
Ā· Security 2
Ā· Transport Service
Ā· Association
Ā· Association Group Information
Ā· Multi Channel Association
Ā· Device Reset Locally
Ā· Firmware Update Meta Data
Ā· Indicator
Ā· Notification
Ā· Powerlevel
Ā· Supervision
Ā· Version
Ā· Binary Switch
Ā· Configuration
Ā· Manufacturer Specific
Ā· Meter

The white one does not send this LR request, only a standard Zwave Smart Start request:

[REQ] [ApplicationUpdateRequest]
type: SmartStart_HomeId_Received
remote node ID: 0
NWI home ID: 0xfbxxxxxx
basic device class: Routing End Node
generic device class: 16
specific device class: 0
supported CCs:
Ā· Z-Wave Plus Info
Ā· Security
Ā· Security 2
Ā· Transport Service
Ā· Association
Ā· Association Group Information
Ā· Multi Channel Association
Ā· Device Reset Locally
Ā· Firmware Update Meta Data
Ā· Indicator
Ā· Notification
Ā· Powerlevel
Ā· Supervision
Ā· Version
Ā· Binary Switch
Ā· Configuration
Ā· Manufacturer Specific
Ā· Meter

Don’t know why they are doing this, but we have to contact the shelly support,because this is really unnecessary. Technically, the white plugs should definitely be able to do LR, and the firmware should be able to do it too. So they are limiting this.
Besides, I think the black ones are ugly.