For the humans

[miguelromao]

Its something that we need to realize, its AI and automations will be better and better for (since) ever …
Myself, have been advocate for automations with “baseane” triggers for kind of move to the next step.
As smart homes evolve to “safe homes” or “sensoring homes” , the move as I see it is to focus on humans and not so on functionality UI / Frontend / Layout / GUI / …
I would love to see a feature related to “home mood” and “human stats” , so we could re-focus to “carbon based life forms”

Would this be accomplish by a combination of automations with/or scenes , person focus data or should this be left to the AI to control everything in an harmonious way ?

I would upvote , so topic gets traction in a “human” way

edited:
maybe its just a personal view.

[Sir_Goodenough ((SG) WhatAreWeFixing.Today)]

Hello miguelromao,

Well I’m a Human, are you?

If you were, you would have probably have known enough to actually vote for your own post. You say…

@miguelromao

I would upvote , so topic gets traction in a “human” way

But you don’t actually do so…

I’m not quite sure what code you are requesting changes to. If you need some help with the topic this is available as guidelines for creating another Feature Request. Feature Request Guidelines 📔 It provides a good summary for any “one” to create a good Feature Request.

[jackjourneyman (Jack)]

@miguelromao

Myself, have been advocte for automations with “baseane” triggers for kind of move to the next step.

I’m going to be charitable, and assume that you’re human…

If you mean “Bayesian”, this has been around for some time.

Bayesian

There’s a good post here:

How Bayes Sensors work, from a Statistics Professor (with working Google Sheets!)

I’ve seen dozens of Bayes Binary Sensor explanations. As both a programmer and a statistics professor, they all give me the shivers. There are explanations out these that are wrong both from a math & statistics perspective and from a programming & implementation perspective. So, here is the definitive explanation. Grab some coffee, and lets get down to brass-stats. Weaved within the post is how I think about setting the values for these sensors (from a real stats perspective). Knowing how the …

[orange-assistant (wisecracker)]

@miguelromao

I would upvote

You didn’t and the usefulness of your post for humans might be doubtful

[miguelromao]

I just wanted to trigger some thoughts about it and already voted

[miguelromao]

you are right - thank you.
Maybe I gave the idea of “Bayesian sensors into Home Assistant” when what I would like to trigger was more in the way of “sensoring home” and “caring home” , as an entity that could even take actions on behalf the “home” .
in the long run , maybe pocket money to manage

[miguelromao]

indeed you are right - I’m human and as everyone else , different from any other
I will look into the “Bayesian sensors into Home Assistant” so I can give a sense of reasoning to the aglomerate of generated data .

[miguelromao]

thanks - upvoted (as human).
about the code, it’s materialized in my “volatile” brain as “home entity” with email , able to reply as “home agent” and “papperless” organizer.
At the same time, would allow to assume ownership and delegate in case the home admin pass away.