Hi everyone,
trying to solve something that I thought would be easy, but can’t find a solution:
I have a sections based dashboard which is 2 sections wide.
In one of the rows I have two cards, one using 2/3 of the columens and one using 1/3.
This is the row giving me headache.
All the other rows use only one large card or two cards that share the columns half-half.
When the layout collapses to 1 section on smaller (mobile) devices, the cards are ordered below instead of next to each other (as supposed).
The larger card (configured to use 2/3 of the 2 sections) is finely reducing its width to one section, resulting in a full width layout on the smaller screens.
But the other card stays smaller, as it’s configured to use less than a whole section. ![]()
This looks quite stupid and I would like to increase the width to the full section in this case.
While this sounds like “works as intended”, I still ask myself if there’s really no way to get around this.
I know I can solve this by using layout_card and provide my own grid code.
As you can use screen width based overrides here, this gives even more flexibility for sure.
But this is an already large section based layout I’m quite happy with, beside this one exception.
So maybe there’s a hack I missed so far. ![]()