[Correction, added Sep 5] The measurement below is wrong, and the mechanism I gave for it is wrong. I had only looked at the x marginal. Plotting the joint (x, y) distribution over the full 275,038 pairs (nineteen days, not four) shows the points I called “through the near wall” are specular reflections — mirror images of people inside the room — not people in the room behind it. Three real clusters, 824 mm apart, imply a mirror plane that agrees to within 85 mm, and the phantom share is 8.3% of all points, not 1.5%. The adjacent room is also a nursery, not a bedroom, so nobody was lying in bed. What survives is the placement advice: keep a radar away from a large flat surface it can see, or aim along it rather than into it — that holds more strongly for reflection than it did for transmission. Sorry for the noise; I will write the reflection result up properly once I have confirmed what the surface actually is. Original below, errors struck through.
One thing I did not expect until I measured it: how far the sensor sits from a wall changes how much it sees through near that wall.
Living room, LD2450 on a desk, 272,000 coordinate pairs over four days 275,038 coordinate pairs over nineteen days. The sensor is roughly 0.5 m from the wall on one side and 3 m from the wall on the other. Clipping the points to the actual room:
through the near wall (0.5 m away) 1.5% of all points
through the far wall (3 m away) 0.01%
Same sensor, same sensitivity, same session, and 150 times the leakage on the side where the wall is close. The room behind that near wall is a bedroom, so those were someone lying in bed being reported inside my living room.
If you are placing drops now, that argues for keeping a radar away from a shared wall where the layout allows, or aiming it along that wall rather than into it. Sensitivity did not fix it for me. I took it all the way down and the near-wall points were still there, but the geometry did.
Caveat: one apartment, one sensor model, Korean construction where interior walls are light partition rather than concrete. Your walls may attenuate very differently. Treat the ratio as the finding rather than the absolute numbers.