WTH, why does it take soooooo long for a HACS PR to get reviewed?

[0kk0]

Really WTH… about the development process for HACS…

I thought my PR (OtterIR) like three weeks is already taking long time… but then i saw this:

WTH, why does it take more than half a year to get your PR reviewed by a core developer?

This WTH is more about the development process, is that also allowed? Beginning of March I opened a PR on Github, it took 2 months before someone reviewed it, a month later I got some comments from a core developer bus since then it was not really reviewed by a core developer again. The only comment I got from a core developer what that I didn’t use a feature that was added a few weeks before. Sure I didn’t, the PR was from long before that. So, either the feature is not valued or there’s a la…

Come on, this cannot be right?

[tom_l]

@0kk0

but then i saw this:

That is a post from 4 years ago. Is it still relevant?

Edit: With the current volume of AI slop integrations being submitted I suppose it might be.

[0kk0]

Yes its still relevant haha
Some PR’s are open for months. I thought for mine three weeks was already a lot

Also use same AI for helping in review

[tom_l]

@0kk0

use same AI for helping in review

[0kk0]

Are you serious that scaptical?
AI here was also not my point. It was the fact that it takes months for PR’s for HACS to be reviewed… Seems like not really great scenario right?

[tilz0R (Tilen)]

There are quite some Created using: Claude commits in the core repository.

[petro]

HACS is managed by 1 guy, it’ll take awhile for anything to get done with the volume of PRs that it has.

1 guy is going to take a long time to review 1200 PRs.