Bayesian rename

Mark, I understand, but I see this also from end user perspective. I’m big fan and “ambasador” of HA using Bayesian widely as a “soft computing” entity in HA.
If the sensor would have different name, Google search would catch that name, so this is not relevant IMHO.
F.e. in @HarvsG 's article here: The Future of the Bayesian Integration - Thoughts wanted is the uncommon name also mentioned as potential problem.
Merry Christmas.