Connecting ESPHome node to Home Assistant across a Wireguard VPN

ESPHome
1

I have two routers with built-in Wireguard capability, and they are connected. The HA server is in the 192.168.10.x network, and the ESPome node is in the 192.168.20.x network. I know mDNS is not routed across, but I naively thought I could just specify the static IP address of the HA server on the ESPHome node and that would be it. It seems there is no way to do that? Could I patch the sources, or is it not that simple?

I also manually added the ESPHome node in HA, and it recognised something, but still it is not displayed as being online. I know I could use MQTT as a workaround, but that seem rather unnecessary?

2

No, simply because a esphome node is the server and HA connects (as a client) to it. :bulb:

Any logs? :page_with_curl:

As a side-note I expect mDNS can’t cross your subnets? :twisted_rightwards_arrows:

1 Like
3

No, simply because a esphome node is the server and HA connects (as a client) to it. :bulb:

But then I would expect it to work when I manually add the device via its IP?

As a side-note I expect mDNS can’t cross your subnets? :twisted_rightwards_arrows:

As mentioned, no. I’m not sure if its possible to configure it in a way that will allow that.

4
5

Have you added the AllowedIPs on both routers?

Router 1 (192.168.10.x) should have: AllowedIPs 192.168.20.0/24
Router 2 (192.168.20.x) should have: AllowedIPs 192.168.10.0/24

What that will do is add a route from router 1 to addresses in Router 2 and vice versa.

Now you don’t have to route the whole network, if Router 2 is only communicating with home assistant then you can just use ex. 192.168.10.100/32 (use the correct IP for HA).
Then all traffic from Router 2 to HA should be routed and all traffic back from HA to the node(s) should be routed back to Router 2

6

You should be able to make use of esphome as mDNS is not mandatory but mainly a comfort feature.

But due to the lack of logs (already requested) probably nobody will able without poking in the dark :see_no_evil:

Telling us

is like “my car works somewhat” and asking “what is wrong”? :man_facepalming:

1 Like
7

Thanks for your suggestion, this is the current config for each router:

Router at 192.168.10.1:

[Interface]
PrivateKey = XXX
ListenPort = 50525
Address = 192.168.10.1/24
DNS = 192.168.10.1,192.168.20.1
DNS = fritz.box

[Peer]
PublicKey = XXX
PresharedKey = XXX
AllowedIPs = 192.168.20.0/24
PersistentKeepalive = 25


Router at 192.168.20.1:

[Interface]
PrivateKey = XXX
ListenPort = 55977
Address = 192.168.20.1/24
DNS = 192.168.20.1,192.168.10.1
DNS = fritz.box

[Peer]
PublicKey = XXX
PresharedKey = XXX
AllowedIPs = 192.168.10.0/24
Endpoint = XXX.myfritz.net:50525
PersistentKeepalive = 25

According to your description, that should be correct?

I noticed that I can reach 192.168.10.1 from 192.168.20.x, but I can’t reach 192.168.20.1 from 192.168.10.x. This explains why Home Assistant, which lives in 192.168.10, gets no updates from the ESPHome node in 192.168.20.x. The WireGuard Tunnel is basically unidirectional, and I don’t understand why.

Update: I think my ISP uses CGNAT, maybe this is causing issues.

8

ok,

I checked how I have set up my wireguard from my phone to my router.
On the router I have
10.10.1.1/24
and all peers has one ip each in the same net for allowIPs
10.10.1.20/32

On the phone I have address 10.10.1.20/32
And allowedIPs 0.0.0.0/0 as all traffic will go to my VPN.

Looking at your config, maybe your main router (Router 1) should have one extra AllowIPs set to ex. 192.168.10.250/32

Then your Router 2 under interface have address = 192.168.10.250/32 instead of 192.168.20.1/24
under peer you leave it as it is.

Your Router 2 will have its own dhcp under the LAN with 192.168.20.1/24.
then all traffic from 192.168.20.x will be routed into Router 2 and there it will find the route though the WG interface.

Maybe test this?
You may need to set firewall rules also. so check that too.

9

I’ll first try if I can get rid of CGNAT and then will experiment further. Thanks for your suggestions, its been really helpful!

10

So I’ve changed the IP from CGNAT to a proper one, and now it seems to work. I can’t tell for sure if this is what did it, but the main takeaway is that you don’t need mDNS to add an ESPHome device, its just convenient - you can always add it manually by its IP address.

11

Beside mDNS hostname or IP address the normal/traditional hostname is also allowed and often makes sense when working with different (sub)nets and domains :bulb:

We might never know what this something was :joy: