Tried just now and now it populated as you said…as group.meandher
but it does not show the group in the selector…but eitehr way…i will try now
which version of the blueprint are you using?
I tried hunterjms and mine just now and both show groups
ok…looks like i found my culprit…
i expected the groups etc to be available adhoc…but it seems they need a restart of hass before configuration.yaml gets re-read and groups populated…
Which version i use? hmmm…cant find a version number anywhere, but just copied the blueprint code over the one i had imported a while ago…so i assume todays version is recent?!
you can reload most things from developer tools>yaml including groups. You need to do this for most things you change in yaml.
Mea maxima culpa, that step was a white spot on my hass knowledge map…
Steep learning curve, but happy to be that far…
Only thing missing to my dream is now the clip on the phone…
both clip and screenshot do only give me a link, that seemingly points to nowhere
http://url:8123/api/frigate/notifications/1666347172.617492-141xhv/driveway_cam/clip.mp4
The version is in the blueprint text. and also in the automation screen at the top where you select the blueprint.
I am confused where you got your “full deal yaml” from. It doesn’t look like a blueprint, nor what should come from automations.yaml.
have you installed the frigate integration?
Ok…
full deal is out of automation upper right traces and there the automation config tab
yes, integrationis installed and the 
is on
Version wise, i cannot find anything pointing to a version
Blueprint does show nothing, creating new automation from blueprint does not show a version and the yaml code as you can see also not…
Sorry when a noob like me gives you grey hair 
okay thanks. things are looking okay. The url you posted would be valid as the id comes from frigate itself via mqtt. So the question is why doesn’t it work…
- what exactly appears when you try to load that url?
- is the url an internal or external url? the port makes me think internal. so…
- are you on your home network when testing?
- Can you browse frigate clips through the home assistant media browser?
-
what exactly appears when you try to load that url?
An error page stating that page could not be loaded -
is the url an internal or external url? the port makes me think internal. so…
url is external from phone without wifi enabled…port is 8123 since i just kept it for outside as it is for internal -
are you on your home network when testing?
yes and no…tried both -
Can you browse frigate clips through the home assistant media browser?
yes i can works like a charm, just no files with name clip.mp4
try https:// not http://
https://url:8123/api/frigate/notifications/1666347172.617492-141xhv/driveway_cam/clip.mp4
I don have ssl setup yet…or better, not working flawlessly yet.
trying to learn how to setup nginx as i type
try using the internal IP for me
http://LANIP:8123/api/frigate/notifications/1666347172.617492-141xhv/driveway_cam/clip.mp4
Just tried the fix and glad to say it is working great… getting notifications for all the cameras.
Really appreciate your help!!
1 Like
Good morning…
Just tried and got this
# This site can’t be reached
The webpage at **http://192.168.178.120:8123/api/frigate/notifications/1666347172.617492-141xhv/driveway_cam/clip.mp4** might be temporarily down or it may have moved permanently to a new web address.
ERR_INVALID_RESPONSE
does this load home assistant? If yes, then you have an issue with your frigate integration. it should be allowing you access to the clips and snapshots via that api.
Hello, yes, that gives me access to the login screen…
Will throw integration out again and reinstall…maybe that will help…
Thx for your work on this and your help on top…
Sooo…quick reply…
tried around, but after setting up ssl via nginx, it works with the clips internal and external…for some odd ball reason…
But all working now…
THX so much for this awesome blueprint
I wish we could have a way to adjust the message and title. Not everyone in my home knows English. ):
Should be easy enough to add. let me see…
Edit: untested, see how this goes. 4 new input fields near the bottom
If it’s no good, you might need to edit the original blueprint yourself, hardcoding the language
2 Likes