It is, but as long as it’s not clear if this is an effort to specifically improve this one wake word, or if this helps with setting up any kind of wake word as well, then i see it as valuable feedback when people see reasons why “okay nabu” might from a “usability” perspective not the best choice.
1 Like
@synesthesiam Can I suggest that you take this opportunity to also ask the same people to also say "Home Assistant", “Okey Assist”, and “Okey Jarvis” to help train such models as well so they could be included as alternative models for optional wake words than any user can chance to without too much effort?
By popular demand, it would be awesome if you could include these too as optional standards by default:
-
"Home Assistant" (4 syllables)
-
“Okey Assist” (4 syllables)
-
“Okey Jarvis” (4 syllables)
As requested in repo for community Home Assistant Wake Word Collection (for openWakeWord):
PS: Don’t think it is a good idea to include “Alexa” or “Siri” due to possible copyright infringement concerns.
1 Like
Do you think “Alexa” and “Siri” were in response to millions of people already begging to say these names ? The brand recognition came from the names being used.
A name/word that will not be used in ordinary conversation is desirable. While talking to “computer” is popular (especially for Trekers), “Computer” or “House” would create too many false positives in many homes (especially while TV/radio news is in the background). In fact existing brand recognition would be a problem as it increases the chance of false positives.
I do agree with Hedda that Assist should provide a choice of several well-developed wake words, though I suggest a bit more discussion on which phrases would be best.
2 Likes
I tried several options in my m5 Atom Echo. Sadly, the only wake word my family remember (specially kids) is “Alexa”. 
They use it in other kids houses and in my fathers in law’s.
The point is that many of us Home Assistant entusiasts want ”Home Assistant” to become well known.
We want “Home Assistant” to become a household name and become a brand people recognise.
We want to use “Home Assistant” as the wake word when others visit out homes so we can show it off.
We do not want to say “Hey Nabu”. Nabu is not the project we love.
Nabu Casa is the company that many Home Assistant developers work, but “Nabu” does not represent all Home Assistant developers or the Home Assistant as a whole. Nabu still only represent the company Nabu Casa.
Why not instead use “Okay Assist” and “Hey Assist” as wake words if “Home Assistant” is not unique?
Here with “Assist” I am referring to Home Assistant’s Assist for default conversation agent standard Assist pipeline in Home Assistant:
The integration is also called Assist Satellite
and so is the Assist satellite entity
After all, Home Assistant’s official voice assistant is called “Assist”, and there are even official logos and branding for that name.
Would be great with option to set simply ‘Home Assistant’ as default wake word as a way to show off and help add brand recognition for Home Assistant.
Even on Nabu Casa’s website it says that “Assist” is the official name that the voice assistant, so makes no sence “Nabu” being default?
Assist is also what is described on the main Home Assistant webpage:
Are there any reason why not included “Home Assistant” as a standard wakeword phrase by default?
6 Likes
Just to highlight, there are several microWakeWord options currently available (Okay Nabu, Hey Jarvis, Hey Mycroft), with more coming. We want to use the Wake Word Collective tool to improve other wake words eventually; it just takes time and lots of samples to train good models. Trust us, this is just the start!
We are also interested in allowing language communities to pick wake words that work for them and build models around those. Keep an eye on our socials for when we open the tool for other wake words.
For those interested in making their own wake word, it is possible today with microWakeWord but requires a good GPU and expertise to tune it correctly. We think microWakeWord is the best option for fast on-device waking, but if you really want to make your own wake word it’s possible with openWakeWord (which doesn’t run on-device, but instead is run on your Home Assistant OS) Create your own wake word - Home Assistant
Answering questions that have been asked above (paraphrasing):
Why “Okay Nabu” and not “Hey Home Assistant” or something else?
Ideally, a wake word should not be something you expect to hear often in conversation by people in the home or via media (music, TV). “Nabu” is a fairly unique word, as opposed to “home”, “assistant”, and “assist”. The microWakeWord models are performing really well, and we like “Okay Nabu” 
In time, I expect the training process for microWakeWord to be simplified and for a community collection of wake words to start forming like openWakeWord has.
Does this just improve “Okay Nabu” or also future wake words?
For now, mostly just “Okay Nabu”. However, any audio data for one wake word can be used as “negative” samples for a different one, so it helps other wake words in that sense.
Keep in mind too that this data will be made publicly available under a CC0 license, so it will hopefully help in the development of future wake word systems. This is similar to how we’ve published our text-to-speech datasets in the hope that they will aid the development of future text-to-speech systems.
7 Likes
I’ve used the above link to submit samples as I think it’s the least I can do to support a fantastic project.
But, I’d really like to be able to use something other than okay nabu in my production environment. I just can’t see my household members adopting it easily.
The problem I have is that I can’t get microWakeWord to accept anything other than okay nabu when I want to use hey jarvis
I select hey jarvis in the pipeline and I still have to use okay nabu
2 Likes
Thanks for contributing! Sorry for the confusion: the wake word selected in the pipeline is only for streaming wake word engines. Since microWakeWord is on-device, we have a different mechanism coming in the next release. We plan to adjust the pipeline dialog accordingly 
… On esp32 devices without a headache for novice users?
Currently, the “OK Nabu” wake word is simple to setup… And annoying.
If I could figure out how to litter my home with esp32 devices that would actually respond to “Computer,” I’d love it.
I have this on Assist configuration:
And this on the m5 Atom Echo (flashed with esphome ready-made project for voice assistant):
I am not using microWakeWord? Am I streaming voice all time?
I’m confused.
Edit: I answer myself. I am not using microWakeWord. Ready-Made project for Voice Assistant is not using microWakeWord component.
Yeah I’m really hoping for this, because “Nabu” happens to be a swear word where I’m from. 
5 Likes
As I read it, the data will also be available to commercial, closed source developers.
Although I’d rather be proved wrong.
2 Likes
Could you add the opportunity to also collect data for other wake words?
3 Likes
So it doesn’t seem to be working for me. Even though I get the indicator in the address bar that is telling me the site is accessing my mic there is a red error box saying it can’t.
I would love to help out but unfortunately my Voice Assistant has been borked since the last major espHome update and nothing I have tried will bring it back to life (even a clean build fails). Several people have reported the same issue but this has been closed by the dev’s.
The issue is closed because it’s been fixed.
Have you read any of the comments on that issue? Your config is wrong (see your error):
[mode] is an invalid option for [speaker.i2s_audio]. Did you mean [i2s_mode]?
mode: mono
and 8 comments up from your config is the answer to fix the problem.
change it to read channel: mono and click SAVE
i.e. change
mode: mono
to
channel: mono
1 Like
Hi Jason,
I worked on the revamp of this site and would love to figure this issue out with you. Did you ever get it sorted in the end?
If not I would love to get to the bottom of it. If you could raise an issue on the GitHub repo, I will gladly help! Issues · OHF-Voice/wake-word-collective · GitHub
1 Like
Except you don’t need ESPhome to do this procedure…
1 Like
Thanks for the response @petro.
Yes, I have read through the comments and tried including the following to override what is included within the package but I still get the same error when attempting a clean build.
speaker:
- platform: i2s_audio
id: echo_speaker
i2s_dout_pin: GPIO22
dac_type: external
channel: mono
I have also tried installing the project directly from Ready-Made Projects — ESPHome as suggested in another comment and this also fails.
The issue was closed on 19-Sep and scanning through the comments I count at least 7 people including myself who say that the problem persisted after this.