I have a HCE80s as UFHs (with HRA80 antennas). For me the whole 0.18.* versions do not seem to add any new feature or heat_demand info, no regressions either. I guess it is because of my special setup with the RFG100.
Please make sure of your facts before you mess with it - it is working as expected after all.
But, AFAIK, controller binds to OTB, and TRVs/UFH bind to controller.
Your system is special - you have multiple HCE80 circuits connected to a zone.
Lemme look
I have a HCE80 wih an external antenna (HCA80).
I have an HCE80 with an external antenna (HCA80).
I have a HCC80R.
People with UFH and running 0.18.6 could help me by submitting packet logs.
Anyone else? I need logs using 0.18.6, and the reality is that thereās a very wide variation in implementations of UFH.
Just sent you a PM too. Sorry I meant to do it yesterday evening and I forgot.
The shared drive link I PMād previously has logs which I update regularly. I will continue to do so.
@cinnamon Perhaps you could PM me these links - someone else has downloaded one of them, and so I cannot.
@cinnamon Are you enforcing your known_list
?
If not (the evidence is that you arenāt), you should.
If so, please PM me a copy of your latest configuration.
So, released:
- stable 0.17.15: bugfixes only
- master 0.18.7: correct UFH zone heat demands, bugfixes, tweaks, other
If you have UFH, or use a HGI80, you want 0.18.7.
Just updated!
Thanks for the new version.
Iāve updated to 0.18.7 around 15 minutes ago. No errors to report so far. Seems to behave as 0.18.6 was behaving (i.e. all is working fine but no UFH heat demand on my system).
Your UFH heating controller does not respond to an RQ
- that is, it sends only I
packets, and never any RP
packets.
I donāt know why this is the case, but your not the only one with this issue.
Can you tell me everything you can about your UFH - model/dates?
I wouldnāt have expected this release to fix the above issue. Watch this space.