any reason why you would start on 1 instance now, and separate later? I mean, if making the transition to the new JS implementation, why not do it in the foreseen way at once?
Mainly because I really like the low maintenance approach of HA with regard to running the ZJS server as an add-on and thought it might be easier for first steps as I am not much of a Linux / Docker guru (meaning: I basically have no clue… ). I guess I could use the HA image on the RasPi, use the ZJS add-on and then connect from a different HA install?
My Kwikset 910 is not updating after a one-time state change.
I guess I’ll have to continue running HomeSeer (and a separate Z-Wave network) for my two Z-Wave locks…
I was able to integrate my Fibaro Roller Shutter 3’s but open and close are not working. I can set a specific position without problems. What abour yours?
I have migrated successfully from OZW but my Yale lock no longer has alarmType and alarmLevel, I use to determine which user has unlocked the door.
This is in zwave js log when an event happens it is the user code, any idea if this will be added back or any other way to capture it ? I’ve tried the event listener zwave_js_event
I switched to the new integration yesterday (from OZW) and did not encounter and unexpected issues. I have dimmers, contact sensors, thermostat, and a kwikset lock. All worked as expected. I took a snapshot before doing anything. It’s a great integration and I look forward to future updates!
I knew going into the change that setting config parameters was not supported yet (like changing the color of Inovelli LED status bars). So this was just a temporary change to play with the new integration. I took a snapshot again after playing with the new integration for a day. Then I reloaded the snapshot with the old integration (OZW) and everything worked as it had before the change.
Overall ZwaveJS is awesome for being version 1, and I’ll switch my main HA location to it full time as soon as setting config parameters through automations is added. I have three other locations with Home Assistant and will be moving some of them to ZwaveJS for further testing since they only have a few, non-critical, zwave devices.
I just want to thank Daniel Lando (the developer) of this new integration and all the additional develpers/testers involved in adding this to Home Assistant in record time.
I finally can see the light at the end of the tunnel, as this first release of the zwavejs integration/addon is already way better than the previous lacking two other zwave integration attempts.
With this new integration I can finally have a working center of the house remote zwave interface, which is published via Ser2Net, communicating correctly with Home Assistant, by using “tcp://remote interface ip:remote interface port” as the path for the “USB” adapter when first installing the zwavejz addon. FINALLY!!!
That device isn’t in the config database yet. I created one for that same company’s indoor plug yesterday that got merged into the master. Looks like they are working on a massive import from ZWave alliance that should have that device in there.
I was thinking that ZWAVE JS and ZWAVE JS To MQTT could be installed together for having the great interface of ZWAVE JS To MQTT.
But if i do that, my usb key cannot be share between the two containers.
So, i understand that i’m not understanding anything ?
Yeah, I realize that the device isn’t in the DB yet (I offered to add it a couple of weeks back but was told to wait) but the question was more about the naming convention and what it was based on.
I named the node in the UI but for some reason it didn’t get transferred to HA.
yeah I had that today too, on a brand new device of which I already had setup several (Sensative Strips Guard). So deleted again, after which the second include went successful. And came up with several more sensors;-)
Apparently the type of sensors was alright, only the name and brand etc had not come across correctly. As said, it did on second try.
I was under the impression that that is why the name in HA is “None: Current Value”. There is no product type mapped to that product code. So the default if there is no mapping is “Current Value” Also expand the node in the CP, the binary switch is name Current Value
What makes you think that is the default berhavior? is that listed somewherre or just an assumption?
Not trying to be snarky. I’d just really like to know what to expect and if it’s possible to change it. If not I find it strange since we can do that for MQTT discovery already in th zwavejs UI.
I guess it’s not really a big deal since I can (and likely will need to) change the entity info in HA anyway. Just curious I guess.
No worries, not getting offended. Only reason i think it is the default behavior is that is what all of my devices were labeled as if they were not in the current build’s configs.