wyze bridge not using go2rtc. They using another software on another ports.
Go2rtc support this project as input. Examples should be in the docs.
wyze bridge not using go2rtc. They using another software on another ports.
Go2rtc support this project as input. Examples should be in the docs.
Oops I got things mixed up - theyāre using MediaMX / rtsp-simple-server on 8554. Either way they have WebRTC output now, so no need for go2rtc on this side of things for me, assuming thereās a card that can display it
I think this is a little more complicated than it appeared on the surfaceā¦ I didnāt realize that WebRTC doesnāt come as a standardized streaming format that could simply be picked up by any player.
This helped me understand a bit more:
Unless your Lovelace card happens to work the same way as they designed their player to work (using WHEP) then I was on the wrong track.
For now I think I can probably get away using iframes pointed to the MediaMTX URLs with the streams.
Hi guys.
I use webrtc card since months ago, but I really never put my head into it. Installed, placed cards, works, nice, forgot it.
Premise:
Ha installation is on a debian machine, supervised in docker: it contains ha, addons, but also other containers I preferred to install standalone like portainer, pihole, frigate.
Now I jumped into frigate (I used shinobi nvr but too many issues in the last period, this is another story) that has its go2rtc builtin.
Soā¦ Frigate use its go2rtc to connect to the cameras via rtsp (mixed reolink, imou, yihacked yi, crappy China, via rtsp) and webrtc card do the same (with its go2rtc? See next) , then many connection to the cameras that suffers a bit.
Back to webrtc card
Checking my webrtc configuration, or better to say, go2rtc (builtin in web2rtc) config, I see no url configured (and checking cards, effectively, I used directly rtsp urls). Accessing to builtin go2rtc webui, I see - obviously- no stream in streams, some reference clicking āAddā and checking section Home assistant.
As you can see, Iām a little bit confused right now .
The target
Reduce the amount of connections to the cameras.
Probably I can reach the target configuring webrtc builtin go2rtc to use rtsp streams than use these in cardsā¦ and the use the same go2rtc instance from frigate (without configure the frigate builtin go2rtc) but: how can I reach the webrtc builtin go2rtc instance? http://Ha_ip:8554/camera_name_configured ?
Orā¦ Turning the question: how can I configure webrtc card to reach frigate builtin go2rtc ? Instead rtsp url, simply use http://server_ip:port/go2rtc_camera_name ?
(in my case server_ip is the same of ha and port is externally configured as 7554 on frigate side because 8554 is reserved to webrtc builtin go2rtc).
Too much confusion?
Reuse go2rtc connection
In frigate you configure go2rtc connections to cameras. This coonnection should/may be reused for frigate record stream as well as external streams. That is benefit of go2rtc, one connection 2 camera restreamed in any format needed with reduced connection to cameras
Not sure of your setup But port 1984 for frigate is go2rtc frontend. I links to go2rtc streams there
Sure.
This is what I already do inside frigate, go2rtc configured streams, reused in frigte cameras.
What I ask is another step.
In Home assistant I installed WebRtc card (that have its own go2rtc) and configured with rtsp urlā¦ so with its go2rtc or not, I made a connection inside HA and one inside frigate: I want to know if I can avoid this, pointing from webrtc card to frigate go2rtc instance (supported by webrtc?).
Or, viceversa, I can configure go2rtc builtin webrtc and then poit to it from frigate (instead using go2rtc builtin frigate): in this case what url I have to use withing frigate?
Not sure of your setup But port 1984 for frigate is go2rtc frontend. I links to go2rtc streams there
Sorry typo
If you look at go2rtc frontend it shows all the weblinks to go2rtc streams. Click on ālinksā next to camera.
some minute ago I made a test.
WebRTC card with url set at rtsp://myserver_ip:7554/frigate_go2rtc_cam
7554 port because 8554 itās already used by go2rtc builtin webrtc.
it seems to workā¦ webrtc card show the stream and thereās no noticeable delay between direct rtsp and go2rtc via webrtc. onyl a difference of frame rate (lower on go2rtc).
tomorrow Iāll try to reconfigure all my cards (and having the time, create a single frigate cardā¦ but this is offtopic)
In this way with a single rtsp connection I can feed frigate and webRTC card.
I have just been using the Frigate Lovelace card, it works with any camera not just Frigate ones and it can show sub streams with go2rtc and webrtc support.
I set it up so it only shows a snapshot of a camera and updates every 5s until motion is detected and then switches to live view with go2rtc.
So I can create a tablet with many cameras without using up much resources. The author even said they will allow recording browsing within the card if enough people vote on the feature
Hello everyone,
I inserted the Webrtc card with the image of the Reolink front door into my panel.
Now I want it like this:
By tapping the small preview image on Webrtc, I would like to use the tapping action to get to a new map where the Webrtc camera image is displayed large on the FireTablet.
How can I get the Webrtc image over the entire screen, everything else is not an issue to āset upā for me, but getting the webrtc image to be completely large is not clear to me.
Who has a good tip or instructions for me?
Thank you
Take a look at wallpanel. It can do this. Just ignore the screensaver part of it.
Anyway to force the stream to be live? I planned to use this as baby monitor but after an hour or so the stream is several minutes behind, which isnāt very practical. Iās prefer if it dropped frames to keep the stream more 'live; if that makes sense?
Has anyone else noticed a 2-second lag in MSE stream since the last update (v3.6.0)? RTSP stream is fine."