Simplisafe alarm requiring code and I don't want it to

Configuration
Tags: #<Tag:0x00007f73b4976a88>
#1

I am not sure if this is a Simplisafe integration issue, or a user error.

I totally started over this weekend with a fresh install, reset all of my devices & integrations. I have been running hassio in Docker and I went with the Proxmox install and I am now getting around to rebuilding all of my automations, and integrations.

One of the most annoying problems I have come upon so far is my Simplisafe. Last week I had a card with the status icon and Arm Home, Arm Away - or Disarm buttons only. No keypad. I can not get it back that way. I understand the risk, but I have no wall panels or remote users. I have automations that depend on being able to arm/disarm the alarm without the code. I also want the minimalist card in Lovelace.

What I have tried so far:

  • Entered a specific code in configuration setup by adding integration - (Didn’t work)

  • Made a new entry in configuration.yaml file (Didn’t Work):

simplisafe:
  accounts:
    - username: !secret simplisafe_username
      password: !secret simplisafe_password
      code: !secret simplisafe_code
  • Configuration > Customization > Entities > (alarm) > code_arm_required : changed to false (Didn’t stick or work)

I have run out of ideas. I have tried all of the tricks I have found by googling and searching this forum.

Thanks in advance.

#2

Did you try leaving out the last line starting with code: ?
The docs say it’s optional.

#3

It is getting a bit comical. I now can not edit my configuration.yaml through the file editor. It is giving me this error:

[Errno 30] Read-only file system: '/config/configuration.yaml
undefined

I think I am about ready to go back to the Hassio running in docker on Ubuntu server. I really want to like the Proxmox, I just am not smart enough for this setup. Supervised install on docker may not be officially supported but it was sure easier to use.

I think I will tackle the permission issues now, and then worry about simplisafe!

Thanks for the help.

#4

Don’t give up so fast :slight_smile: I switched to a Proxmox setup more than 2 years ago and it’s one of the best things I did in my opinion.
Are you currently running the Proxmox image?

#5

Yes. I am using the Whiskerz007 script version currently.

I took a pretty recent mac mini and took the spinney drive out and replaced it with an ssd and installed Proxmox. It was nearly too easy. I used this walkthrough: Installing Home Assistant using Proxmox

I couldn’t change the static ip address, and used the hassos command line to change it. It totally messed up my install. I used this walkthrough for my second install: Supervised Install on Proxmox. It then quit booting. I then took GParted and wiped my drive and went back to the first one using the Whiskerz007 script. It has been stable and working well. The biggest problem I am having is my lack of understanding. I understand the concepts, but have a hard time implementing it.

I will stay with Proxmox for now. I really liked the Docker setup better as I had static files outside the container and I had more control since it was just an Ubuntu server (I have a tiny bit more knowledge of Ubuntu, than I do Proxmox)

#6

Just to make things clear, if you run a supervised version (add-ons, supervisor tab, etc. available) then you are running in docker anyway. The only option that doesn’t run in docker is installing Home Assistant Core in a virtual environment.

I use Proxmox as well, with multiple Home Assistant VMs. One VM (production) runs Ubuntu and Home Assistant Core in docker on top (no add-ons, etc., called Home Assistant Container now). The second VM (“development”) runs Ubuntu as well and Home Assistant Core is directly installed in a virtual environment. The third VM (testing) runs Ubuntu and Home Assistant Supervised with add-ons etc. available on top (the not officially supported install on a generic linux machine).

From your post, I assume it would be the best for you to install Ubuntu Server in a Proxmox VM and then install Home Assistamt Supervised on top (the not officialy supported install method). I suggest this guide

#7

Ok, I like that. If I am reading supervised-installer.sh correctly, it is pulling the current dockerfile from official sources. If I am not mistaken the hassio dockerfile I was running was maintained by someone else. That really makes it look appealing. I see that it has instructions for Debian, or Ubuntu.

Awesome. Thank you for the link.

1 Like
#8

Sounds as what you had was a script that sent the code and the buttons in your Lovelace was just buttons to activate the script(s).

I have an automation that arms the the alarm (not simplisafe), call service on the alarm, entity is the alarm panel, the data:

code: 1234

And that works fine.

#9

I don’t remember ever setting that up. It has been running for over a year, and I don’t remember what I ate for breakfast.

That sounds like a good workaround though. I could just make my own card.

Thank you!

#10

It’s so much more fun when you don’t remember.

Imagine how boring it would be of you remembered the mess the kids left behind them.

#11

I do sales for a world-wide industrial automation supplier. My poor memory can cause me a lot of problems. I don’t think I have a bad memory, only so much room in my pea brain to hold data. When something comes in one end something leaves the other.

1 Like
#12

If there remains a SimpliSafe issue, feel free to open a new bug report.

#13

Thanks! I am not sure what is the issue simplisafe or something else. I just nuked my install (intentionally) and will see if it does it on this install.

1 Like