Can I just remove the part that renames the event or do I have to close this PR and submit a new one?
I donāt know as I rarely use the edit function. I suspect just hit the edit button, make the change, and everything will work as hoped. Generally speaking, it wonāt let you do anything āstupidā, which is why I think that the edit button will just work.
I believe I have found where I can edit the file but are you certain I still need to revert it? Your PR appears to be progressing; Martin made the following comment several hours ago:
https://github.com/home-assistant/core/pull/35644#discussion_r425612962
Good point, I misread his comment. Iāve made the change. Guess you have nothing more at the moment.
Well thank you but it took far more hand-holding than I anticipated and the resulting PR still managed to target the wrong branch. Sheesh!
Thank you for your assistance. I look forward to testing the UPB integration in 0.110. It represents the first major integration that I will be moving from Premise to Home Assistant.
UPDATE
Documentation PR was merged.
I now have full register decoding working(on one device so far but building out for the remaining devices should be fairly straight forward).
DEBUG:__main__:Device 1:5 registers:
01:05:00:00:00:01:00:04:00:1d:01:08:00:00:00:00
20:20:20:20:20:20:20:20:20:20:20:20:20:20:20:20
4f:66:66:69:63:65:20:20:20:20:20:20:20:20:20:20
52:69:67:68:74:20:20:20:20:20:20:20:20:20:20:20
01:64:ff:02:00:ff:03:32:ff:04:4b:03:05:19:ff:ff
64:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:f1:64:ff
ff:00:ff:ff:00:ff:ff:00:ff:ff:00:ff:ff:00:ff:ff
ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:fc:09:0b:f1:fe:fa
f1:66:88:33:44:f1:55:77:22:44:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
22:00:ff:22:64:ff:23:00:05:23:64:05:24:ff:ff:21
ff:ff:20:ff:ff:22:00:00:22:64:00:22:00:01:22:64
01:22:00:08:22:64:08:25:1e:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00
00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:00:a6:00:ff:55:00:00
DEBUG:__main__:Device 1:5: {'device_name': b'Right ',
'dim_options': 241,
'firmware_major_version': 1,
'firmware_minor_version': 8,
'led_options': 9,
'link_ids': [1, 100, 255, 2, 0, 255, 3, 50, 255, 4, 75, 3, 5, 25, 255, 255],
'manufacturer_id': 4,
'module_id': 5,
'net_id': 1,
'network_name': b' ',
'password': 0,
'preset_fade_table': [255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
241,
100,
255],
'preset_level_table': [100,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255,
255],
'product_id': 29,
'reserved1': [255],
'reserved2': [255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 34],
'rocker_action': [{'bottom_rocker_double_click': 119,
'bottom_rocker_hold': 34,
'bottom_rocker_release': 68,
'bottom_rocker_single_click': 85,
'bottom_rocker_tid': 241,
'top_rocker_double_click': 136,
'top_rocker_hold': 51,
'top_rocker_release': 68,
'top_rocker_single_click': 102,
'top_rocker_tid': 241},
{'bottom_rocker_double_click': 255,
'bottom_rocker_hold': 255,
'bottom_rocker_release': 255,
'bottom_rocker_single_click': 255,
'bottom_rocker_tid': 255,
'top_rocker_double_click': 255,
'top_rocker_hold': 255,
'top_rocker_release': 255,
'top_rocker_single_click': 255,
'top_rocker_tid': 255},
{'bottom_rocker_double_click': 255,
'bottom_rocker_hold': 255,
'bottom_rocker_release': 255,
'bottom_rocker_single_click': 255,
'bottom_rocker_tid': 255,
'top_rocker_double_click': 255,
'top_rocker_hold': 255,
'top_rocker_release': 255,
'top_rocker_single_click': 255,
'top_rocker_tid': 255},
{'bottom_rocker_double_click': 255,
'bottom_rocker_hold': 255,
'bottom_rocker_release': 255,
'bottom_rocker_single_click': 255,
'bottom_rocker_tid': 255,
'top_rocker_double_click': 255,
'top_rocker_hold': 255,
'top_rocker_release': 255,
'top_rocker_single_click': 255,
'top_rocker_tid': 255}],
'rocker_config': 11,
'rocker_options': 250,
'rocker_transmit_options': 252,
'room_name': b'Office ',
'serial_number': 0,
'transmission_options': 254,
'upb_options': 0,
'upb_version': 1}
DEBUG:__main__:manufacturer = SimplyAutomated, product = SA_US2_40
I think Iāve now got all the register maps extracted from upstart, Iāve pushed an update of my library to pypi.
It would be helpful if some people can verify it decodes the registers on different device types, as before it can be installed and run via:
python3 -m pip install upb
python3 -m upb.tools.dumpreg --host=192.168.1.32 --network=1 --device=5
The device register maps are here while the mappings for the manufacture/product IDās are here.
I figured out how premise is doing this, itās quite clever, they are exploiting a flaw in the UPB protocol which makes it possible to massively reduce the amount of requests required to brute force the network password.
Reading the UPB documentation one would assume there are a maximum of 65536 passwords you would have to try, which would take a very long time with how slow the UPB protocol is.
However by using the getdevicesignature command one can get the checksum for the registers which surprisingly is computed based on all register values even when not in setup mode, including the password registers which are not returned by the getregistervalues command unless in setup mode.
Because of this design flaw we can compute the sum of the two bytes that contain the 16 bit password by subtracting the computed register checksum(which doesnāt contain the password registers unless in setup mode) from the real checksum(which always covers the password registers) returned by getdevicesignature, this reduces the amount of possible passwords we have to try from 65536 to at most 256(in practice it should be much less than this most of the time).
Iāve currently implemented the checksum computations needed for this and should have this feature fully implemented shortly, I just need to make it brute force the possible passwords obtained by subtracting the computed register checksum from the real register checksum.
Great detective work!
Itās becoming increasingly clear that the unknown author of Premiseās UPB driver (only known by the moniker āGeorgeSā) had keen insight into the UPB protocol (back in 2006). Fortunately for us, that knowledge wasnāt lost, just tucked away in many lines of C++ code, waiting to be re-discovered.
When I have a chance, Iāll try your library and report my results.
Yep, the premise code is very professionally written, itās cleaner than the upstart code and extremely well commented, the upstart code release is not quite as clean or well commented but Iāve now gotten fairly familiar with it so that I can use it to fill in various knowledge gaps not covered by the premise code. Iāve been using both extensively as a reference for understanding how to best implement certain features and serialize/parse various UPB data.
I think I know why the premise developers decided to automatically crack the network passwords, due to the same checksum bug that makes cracking the password fast itās not actually possible to validate the register checksum unless you also know the password. I bet the premise devs were trying to figure out why their register checksums werenāt validating correctly and ended up implementing the password crack capability as a workaround in order to make it possible to validate the register checksums. From my reading of the upstart code it doesnāt appear upstart validates the register checksums at all due to this issue.
So there were a lot more different register device memory maps than I originally expected, this would have been a big problem if it were not for the upstart code release that has a header file that contains what appears to be the complete memory map tables for every single production UPB device ever created(along with some that may not have even made it to production).
In addition there is also seemingly complete MID/DID mappings for the manufacturer id and device id pairs which allows associating devices to their correct device class specific register memory map table.
I was able to import all these memory mapping tables into my python library using ctypes which provides a nice clean abstraction layer for reading/writing to them, in total I currently count 18 distinct memory map tables used by different UPB devices(there are many more UPB devices than this as a lot of these maps are shared across various devices and manufacturers).
I now have automatic password discovery working as part of the register dump process, thereās a few optimizations I still need to do to speed it up but itās relatively fast even when brute force searching nearly all 256 possible passwords.
Is anyone running the UPB code in Core? Iām tempted but nervous about the changes Iāll have to make to my automations.
@gwww
I have tried the release version of the UPB integration and have a failure to report. Shall I post it in this thread or start a new one?
Start with posting here.
Iām testing the UPB integration on a fresh installation of Home Assistant 0.110.0 on an RPI3 (i.e. clean test-bed; default configuration; no other integrations). Iām using a āknown goodā serial-to-USB cable and a Simply Automated Serial PIM (in Message mode). The cable and PIM were used for testing the beta version of the UPB integration.
Upon plugging the cable into the RPI3, it is detected by HassOS and reported in Supervisor > System > Hardware as two devices (by name and by port number):
serial:
/dev/serial/by-id/usb-Prolific_Technology_Inc._USB-Serial_Controller_D-if00-port0
/dev/ttyUSB0
I copied the UPB configuration file to the RPI3 in /config/upb.upe
.
Hereās a screenshot of the initial config flow screen:
After submitting the data, several seconds pass and then it returns with the following error:
Failed to connect to UPB PIM, please try again.
Screenshot:
The connection failure is reported in the log:
2020-05-22 12:42:27 WARNING (MainThread) [upb_lib.upb] Could not connect to UPB PIM ([Errno 2] could not open port /dev/ttyUSB0: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/dev/ttyUSB0'). Retrying in 1 seconds
2020-05-22 12:42:28 WARNING (MainThread) [upb_lib.upb] Could not connect to UPB PIM ([Errno 2] could not open port /dev/ttyUSB0: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/dev/ttyUSB0'). Retrying in 2 seconds
2020-05-22 12:42:30 WARNING (MainThread) [upb_lib.upb] Could not connect to UPB PIM ([Errno 2] could not open port /dev/ttyUSB0: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/dev/ttyUSB0'). Retrying in 4 seconds
2020-05-22 12:42:34 WARNING (MainThread) [upb_lib.upb] Could not connect to UPB PIM ([Errno 2] could not open port /dev/ttyUSB0: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/dev/ttyUSB0'). Retrying in 8 seconds
2020-05-22 12:42:42 ERROR (MainThread) [homeassistant.components.upb.config_flow] Timed out after 15 seconds trying to connect with UPB PIM at serial:///dev/ttyUSB0
I repeated the test using the serial portās alternate name:
/dev/serial/by-id/usb-Prolific_Technology_Inc._USB-Serial_Controller_D-if00-port0
but the result was the same.
2020-05-22 13:08:40 WARNING (MainThread) [upb_lib.upb] Could not connect to UPB PIM ([Errno 2] could not open port /dev/serial/by-id/usb-Prolific_Technology_Inc._USB-Serial_Controller_D-if00-port0: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/dev/serial/by-id/usb-Prolific_Technology_Inc._USB-Serial_Controller_D-if00-port0'). Retrying in 1 seconds
2020-05-22 13:08:41 WARNING (MainThread) [upb_lib.upb] Could not connect to UPB PIM ([Errno 2] could not open port /dev/serial/by-id/usb-Prolific_Technology_Inc._USB-Serial_Controller_D-if00-port0: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/dev/serial/by-id/usb-Prolific_Technology_Inc._USB-Serial_Controller_D-if00-port0'). Retrying in 2 seconds
2020-05-22 13:08:43 WARNING (MainThread) [upb_lib.upb] Could not connect to UPB PIM ([Errno 2] could not open port /dev/serial/by-id/usb-Prolific_Technology_Inc._USB-Serial_Controller_D-if00-port0: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/dev/serial/by-id/usb-Prolific_Technology_Inc._USB-Serial_Controller_D-if00-port0'). Retrying in 4 seconds
2020-05-22 13:08:47 WARNING (MainThread) [upb_lib.upb] Could not connect to UPB PIM ([Errno 2] could not open port /dev/serial/by-id/usb-Prolific_Technology_Inc._USB-Serial_Controller_D-if00-port0: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/dev/serial/by-id/usb-Prolific_Technology_Inc._USB-Serial_Controller_D-if00-port0'). Retrying in 8 seconds
2020-05-22 13:08:55 ERROR (MainThread) [homeassistant.components.upb.config_flow] Timed out after 15 seconds trying to connect with UPB PIM at serial:///dev/serial/by-id/usb-Prolific_Technology_Inc._USB-Serial_Controller_D-if00-port0
I disconnected the cable and PIM from the RPI3, connected it to the laptop I had used (0.108.5, docker) with the beta UPB integration (configured in YAML) and it found the PIM and worked correctly. This re-confirms the cable and PIM are functional.
From my understanding by default the RPI images for home assistant run home assistant in a container which doesnāt have access to USB devices unless configured a certain way.
Iām unfamiliar with that constraint. Itās my understanding that whatever is reported in the Supervisor > System > Hardware list is readily accessible.
Hereās a post that says the same:
Otherwise this alleged USB-device constraint would affect all RPI3 users who plug in coordinators for Zigbee and zwave.
Hmmm. I donāt know how to fix this. Iāve never used a USB connected device in hassio. When I did ElkM1 it was network connected. The UPB is USB connected to a windows box that runs a serial to TCP proxy, so UPB is network connected.
What I have tested and what I know works is a USB connected UPB PIM using a serial to USB adapter. That was tested on a MacBook. Similar to your hardware. The difference is Docker.
Iāll do some searches to see what I can uncover. Iād recommend you do the same. Letās see what we can come up with.
What is clear from the error message is that the device name is not understood. Perhaps poke on the hassio forums or Discord chat.
A few more details regarding the system used for the beta version (i.e. the one that works). Itās running Home Assistant Core 0.108.5 in Docker. Iām using docker-compose and hereās the relevant portion that maps the serial-to-USB cable from its āreal-worldā device name to the port name visible within the Docker container.
devices:
- "/dev/serial/by-id/usb-Prolific_Technology_Inc._USB-Serial_Controller_D-if00-port0:/dev/ttyUSB0"
In configuration.yaml
, I specify the port name visible within the Docker container, namely /dev/ttyUSB0
.
upb:
url: serial:///dev/ttyUSB0:4800
file_path: ./upb.upe
All of this plumbing works correctly on this system running the beta version.
Home Assistant 0.110.0 on an RPI3 (a.k.a. the old āhassioā) includes Home Assistant Core as a docker container. However, thereās no user intervention required to map āreal worldā ports to how they are seen within the container. Theoretically, this is done for the user and revealed in the Hardware list.