Uptime in days hours and minutes

Yes, it works. I had a look in my config file and I’ve apparently added another type of entity as well:

sensor:

  #HASS uptime
  - platform: uptime
    name: Uptime

  - platform: template
    sensors:
      uptimev2:
        friendly_name: Uptimev2
        value_template: >
          {{ (as_timestamp(now()) - as_timestamp(states('sensor.uptime'))) // 60|int }}

  - platform: template
    sensors:
     home_assistant_uptime:
        friendly_name: Home Assistant Uptime
        value_template: >- 
          {% set up_time = as_timestamp(now())-as_timestamp(states('sensor.uptime')) %}
          {% set minutes = (up_time // 60)|int %}
          {% set hours = minutes // 60 %}
          {% set days = hours // 24 %}
          {% set minutes = minutes % 60 %}
          {% set hours =  hours % 24 %}
          {% set days = days % 7 %}
          {% macro phrase(value,name) %}
            {%- set value = value %}
            {%- set end = 's' if value > 1 else '' %}
            {{- '{} {}{}'.format(value,name,end) if value|int > 0 else '' }}
          {%- endmacro %}
          {% set text = [phrase(days,'day'),phrase(hours,'hour'),
                         phrase(minutes,'min')]
                         |select('!=','')|list|join(', ') %}
          {% set last_comma = text.rfind(',') %}
          {% if last_comma != -1 %}
            {% set text = text[:last_comma] + ' and' + text[last_comma + 1:] %}
          {% endif %}
          {{text}}

Seems there are others with similiar errors and recommended checking the template editor for debugging but maybe that is what you’ve already tried?:

1 Like

Yep. Other errors …
It was just a typo. What about AI? :wink:

Hi, I have a question:

Is this still the correct way to get the uptime sensor?

sensor:
  - platform: uptime
    name: Time Online

Or should it follow the new template format?

template:
  - sensor:
      - name: "Server uptime"
        state: ???

Thank you.

did you read Uptime - Home Assistant ?

1 Like

Yes, but isn’t it a template sensor? I feel that code follows the legacy sensor configuration format

no, where did you get the idea this is a template sensor? some of the others above are, but this is a core integration

1 Like

I see, thank you.

Here is how I would do it:

{{ states('sensor.ha_uptime') }}
{% set total_seconds = as_timestamp(utcnow())-as_timestamp(states('sensor.ha_uptime')) %}
{{ total_seconds }}
{% set days = (total_seconds / 86400) | int %}
{{ days }}
{% set hours = ((total_seconds % 86400) / 3600 ) | int %}
{{ hours }}
{% set minutes = ((total_seconds % 3600) / 60 ) | int %}
{{ minutes }}
{% set seconds = (total_seconds % 60) | int %}
{{ seconds }}
{{ [days, hours, minutes, seconds]|join(':') }}

You can cut & paste this in to developer templates and you should get something like this:

if you want a nicer state than the uptime sensor, why not use the template sensor posted above somewhere:

template:

  - sensor:

      - unique_id: ha_uptime_phrase
        name: Ha uptime phrase
        icon: mdi:history
        state: >-
          {%- set up = now().timestamp()-as_timestamp(states('sensor.uptime')) %}

          {%- macro phrase(name,divisor,mod=None) %}
            {%- set value = ((up//divisor) % (mod if mod else divisor))|int %}
            {%- set end = 's' if value > 1 else '' %}
            {{- '{} {}{}'.format(value,name,end) if value|int > 0 else ''}}
          {%- endmacro %}

          {%- set values = [phrase('week',60*60*24*7),
                            phrase('day',60*60*24,7),
                            phrase('hour',60*60,24),
                            phrase('min',60),
                            phrase('sec',1,60)]
                            |select('!=','')|list %}
          {{values[:-1]|join(', ') ~ ' and ' ~ values[-1] if values|length > 1 else
            values|first}}

That output is basically identical to a timedelta as a string.

{{ utcnow() - states('sensor.ha_uptime') | as_datetime | default(utcnow()) }}

This would not give the OP the days as requested.

Am I missing something?

You overwrote total_seconds with a time from 2 days ago, so your as_timestamp calc has a difference of 2 days. OP is asking for days hours and minutes, not seconds. So in that regard, they are both wrong. Either way, this is the real difference (without incorrectly overwriting the difference)

DUH! Missed changing yours. Sorry for the stupidity.

This might be an old post, but I solved this via:

sensor:
  - platform: uptime

template:
  - sensor:
      - name: Uptime Relative
        state: >-
          Up {{ states("sensor.uptime") | as_datetime | relative_time }}
2 Likes

But this does not give you the HH:MM:SS format that the OP wanted.

Whoops! I guess I solved a different problem… I didn’t read closely enough :sweat_smile:

In case anyone else is struggling with this, the documentation is confusing to say the least.

sensor:
  - platform: uptime
    name: "HA Runtime"

makes your builtin sensor be called now sensor.ha_runtime, because… why not? it’s quite obvious right?, even if the docs say: “name: Name to use in the frontend.” (should be “while adding an underscore for good measure and changing the entity name for you”) :slight_smile:

1 Like

What did you expect instead? This normalization is common everywhere, isn’t it?

For the most part, yes

I have to agree that is obvious to someone who lives and breaths HA, I get that. It was not obvious for me.

Maybe you care to explain why this is too:

sensor:
  - platform: onewire
    names:
      28-8367301e64ff: temp_one_wire

But the sensor is called: sensor.28_8367301e64ff_temperature → note the underscore and the suffix.

I understand that under the hood any character you don’t like gets translated to underscore, but I fail to understand how is that obvious. Normal engineering decision I would say, but it should be documented, that’s all I’m saying.