Ah got it. Your back door is a BE469 right?
Sure is. Works well
Bringing this back from the dead. Not sure if I should lay any packages on top of this as I can’t get it to lock or unlock after pairing. Everything seems to be added correctly, but calling a lock or unlock service looks like it’s resulting in a timeout error. I’m pretty new to most of this. Can anyone help? Should I try installing @ptdalen’s package?
Here’s the log when I try to unlock the door:
2020-06-14 17:53:19.109 Info, Node020, Value::Set - COMMAND_CLASS_DOOR_LOCK - Locked - 0 - 1 - False
2020-06-14 17:53:19.110 Info, Node020, Value_Lock::Set - Requesting lock to be Unlocked
2020-06-14 17:53:19.110 Detail, Node020, Queuing (Send) DoorLockCmd_Set (Node=20): 0x01, 0x0a, 0x00, 0x13, 0x14, 0x03, 0x62, 0x01, 0x00, 0x25, 0x7c, 0xcb
2020-06-14 17:53:19.110 Detail, Node020, Queuing (Send) DoorLockCmd_Get (Node=20): 0x01, 0x09, 0x00, 0x13, 0x14, 0x02, 0x62, 0x02, 0x25, 0x7d, 0xcb
2020-06-14 17:53:19.110 Detail,
2020-06-14 17:53:19.110 Info, Node020, Sending (Send) message (Callback ID=0x7c, Expected Reply=0x04) - DoorLockCmd_Set (Node=20): 0x01, 0x0a, 0x00, 0x13, 0x14, 0x03, 0x62, 0x01, 0x00, 0x25, 0x7c, 0xcb
2020-06-14 17:53:19.115 Detail, Node020, Received: 0x01, 0x04, 0x01, 0x13, 0x01, 0xe8
2020-06-14 17:53:19.116 Detail, Node020, ZW_SEND_DATA delivered to Z-Wave stack
2020-06-14 17:53:20.358 Detail, Node020, Received: 0x01, 0x05, 0x00, 0x13, 0x7c, 0x00, 0x95
2020-06-14 17:53:20.358 Detail, Node020, ZW_SEND_DATA Request with callback ID 0x7c received (expected 0x7c)
2020-06-14 17:53:20.358 Info, Node020, Request RTT 1248 Average Request RTT 1211
2020-06-14 17:53:20.358 Detail, Expected callbackId was received
2020-06-14 17:53:29.111 Error, Node020, ERROR: Dropping command, expected response not received after 1 attempt(s)
2020-06-14 17:53:29.111 Detail, Node020, Removing current message
2020-06-14 17:53:29.111 Detail, Node020, Notification: Notification - TimeOut
2020-06-14 17:53:29.111 Detail,
2020-06-14 17:53:29.111 Info, Node020, Sending (Send) message (Callback ID=0x7d, Expected Reply=0x04) - DoorLockCmd_Get (Node=20): 0x01, 0x09, 0x00, 0x13, 0x14, 0x02, 0x62, 0x02, 0x25, 0x7d, 0xcb
2020-06-14 17:53:29.117 Detail, Node020, Received: 0x01, 0x04, 0x01, 0x13, 0x01, 0xe8
2020-06-14 17:53:29.117 Detail, Node020, ZW_SEND_DATA delivered to Z-Wave stack
2020-06-14 17:53:30.328 Detail, Node020, Received: 0x01, 0x05, 0x00, 0x13, 0x7d, 0x00, 0x94
2020-06-14 17:53:30.329 Detail, Node020, ZW_SEND_DATA Request with callback ID 0x7d received (expected 0x7d)
2020-06-14 17:53:30.329 Info, Node020, Request RTT 1217 Average Request RTT 1214
2020-06-14 17:53:30.329 Detail, Expected callbackId was received
2020-06-14 17:53:39.112 Error, Node020, ERROR: Dropping command, expected response not received after 1 attempt(s)
2020-06-14 17:53:39.112 Detail, Node020, Removing current message
2020-06-14 17:53:39.113 Detail, Node020, Notification: Notification - TimeOut
I’ll try to provide more input later, but if your lock does not lock or unlock natively, then packages/automations, will not help, and will likely complicate things for you. It looks like the lock is having communication issues.
Did you pair the lock using Add Node Secure? You will need to have a zwave network key for that too. Without pairing it securely these functions won’t work.
I did pair using that button but how can I tell if actually added securely?
I’ve read somewhere that it adds regardless.
Well I dont see a NONCES report in your OZW logs so that suggests it wasn’t added properly. Start from here to ensure you have done everything properly:
Thanks for sending me there. Somehow ~20 devices and ~38 entities in, z-wave devices in, I never noticed that I missed creating a security key. I unpaired the lock, configged in a security key, restarted and added secure. Now all of the core functions are working
Side question - I have a bunch of other devices - mostly motion sensors and lights and switches that are sitting on my z-wave stack that I now know have all been added unsecure. Should I go back and re-add them secure? I already have a lot of binary sensors built on top of them - would these entity IDs lose their mapping if I remove and re-add?
Its really only for security devices like a lock, you can tell if you did not pair it correctly because some functionality is missing. If you suspect a device has missing functionality then yes you’ll want to pair it securely. Entity ID’s may lose mapping but you can always rename.
1 Like