0.116: Entities card row editor, restore snapshots and performance metrics

I don’t think that’s the case at all. The documents page mentions nothing of the sort. Also I’m using them in my system and am not getting any deprecation notices. The old method of defining them is deprecated, but not the concept of them. Defining them in the new way (per the docs) is still supported and working.

Their working OK in my system still. I don’t see any big differences between out configs though, sadly.
You’ve added the broadlink device via the config flow correctly?
Maybe try names that don’t have spaces or upper case?
This is my config, which is working.

#Broadlink RM Mini 3
- platform: broadlink
  mac: '78:0f:77:XX:XX:XX'
  switches:
    - name: humidifier_power
      command_on: 'JgBYAAABKJUUERMTEhMSExMTExISExMSFDcSOBM4EzcUNxI4FDcSOBQ3EzgSExITEhMTEhQSEhMTEhITEzgTNxQ3EjkSOBI4EwAFGAABKEoSAAxgAAEnSxMADQU=='
      command_off: 'JgBYAAABKJUUERMTEhMSExMTExISExMSFDcSOBM4EzcUNxI4FDcSOBQ3EzgSExITEhMTEhQSEhMTEhITEzgTNxQ3EjkSOBI4EwAFGAABKEoSAAxgAAEnSxMADQU=='
    - name: humidifier_mist_level
      command_on: 'JgBQAAABKJUTEhITExMSExMSEhMTExITEjgTOBM4EjgSORI4EzgSOBI5EjgSORI4EjkSExITExITExITEhMTExITEjgTOBI4EgAFGQABKEoTAA0FAAAAAAAAAAA=='
      command_off: 'JgBQAAABKJUTEhITExMSExMSEhMTExITEjgTOBM4EjgSORI4EzgSOBI5EjgSORI4EjkSExITExITExITEhMTExITEjgTOBI4EgAFGQABKEoTAA0FAAAAAAAAAAA=='
    - name: livingroom_tv_power_ir
      command_on: 'JgBQAAABKJMTEhMSEzYTEhMSExITEhMSEjcSNxMSEzYTNhM3EzYTNhQSExISExI3EhIUEhMSEhITNhM3EzYTEhM2FDYTNhM2FAAFKgABJ0kTAA0FAAAAAAAAAAA='
      command_off: 'JgBQAAABKJMTEhMSEzYTEhMSExITEhMSEjcSNxMSEzYTNhM3EzYTNhQSExISExI3EhIUEhMSEhITNhM3EzYTEhM2FDYTNhM2FAAFKgABJ0kTAA0FAAAAAAAAAAA='

@Silicon_Avatar you are correct, my mistake. I got confused with the IP address requirement change in 115 as per this thread 0.115 New Broadlink integration, no switches how to show in Lovelace

I’m getting this too! Did you get any further with this?

I ended up cutting power to the RPi, re-connecting, and tried it again. It worked then! Probably still needs work on it to be bug-free though.

I finally decided to go from 0.115.x to 0.116.2 fearing the consequences.
And just off the bat.
After a reboot, the deconz-firesensors (which wasn’t activate there were no smoke), the sensors in HA made the node-red alert activate.
The up/down arrows for all the curtains didn’t show up until a reload of the GUI, a lot of icons didn’t show up until a reload (and this was after the message that a new desktop was available, and if I wanted to reload).
lazy-loading gone crazy if not even the built-in cards get’s their icons properly, yet alone the custom cards.

I think I read that some people had the icon issue fixed with a browser cache clear.

Ok, the smoke sensors was not due to the restart, it was a happenstance that they were actually triggered at the same time :slight_smile:

Will give this another go. I had reviewed the breaking changes from 115 to 116 but yes, it did do an upgrade. Before starting, i downgraded to 115 and thought that would take care of anything I had missed.

anyone got any further insights into the Timestamp overflow detected: dts errors? recording of camera streams is bombning out aftyer 2 or 4 secs when its set to 30. didn’t used to be this way

I’m sorry but I have no news about it, I just know that someone has opened an issue on github, but it seems to be lacking in information.
https://github.com/home-assistant/core/issues/41747

upgrade to 116.3 breaks onvif integration

Logger: homeassistant.setup
Source: setup.py:138
First occurred: 15:24:31 (1 occurrences)
Last logged: 15:24:31

Setup failed for onvif: Unable to import component: No module named 'zeep.asyncio'

entities cannot be removed or added new

1 Like

I’m seeing this now too.

I raised an issue now on github, hopefully it has enough info:

Can anybody expound on the automation “breaking change”?:

State conditions with attribute specified: When testing against a non-string attribute value, you now need to specify the value in your configuration in the same type as it is in the attribute (instead of as a string).

The release documentation is very sparse and I didn’t see any examples given when looking in the automations->conditions documentation or in the associated PR.

What exactly is the situation that this change is referring to?

Lets say you had a sensor and the sensor had an attribute that was a number. Then this would not work:

trigger:
  platform: state
  entlty_id: sensor.finity
  attribute: number
  to: '2'

but this would:

trigger:
  platform: state
  entlty_id: sensor.finity
  attribute: number
  to: 2

The opposite would be the case if the attribute number contained a string. The first trigger would work. The second would not.

2 Likes

Upgraded to 116.3, and my OVNIF camera failed. I tried to remove the integration to re add it, and it wont remove. I’ve started HA, and restarted the docker container. Anyone else having camera issues with 116.3?

I am experiencing exactly the same issues

And that only applies if you use the “attribute:” option and doesn’t change anything if that option isn’t used?

For example:

when using a normal state trigger (without the attribute) you could put the state in without converting it to a string. The only thing that you needed to explicitly define as a string was “off” & “on” to avoid confusing them with booleans.

I’m pretty sure that this worked:

trigger:
  platform: state
  entity_id: device_tracker.me
  to: home

Does it still?

That change seems to be saying that if I use the simple state trigger that I can still put the “to:” values in without explicitly converting them to strings but if I use the “attribute:” I now have to explicitly convert the compared value to the correct data type for it to work?

So I assume this wouldn’t work (contrived example):

trigger:
  platform: state
  entity_id: device_tracker.me
  attribute: source_type
  to: router

since the “to:” value (router) isn’t explicitly defined as a string?

Same here. All my OVNIF cameras are gone in 116.3.
And the “not a Frame instance” (google cloud tts) problem is still there too.
It’s free, so not complaining, but next time I’ll wait even longer before upgrading…

I revereted to 116.2 and it’s all working again. I’m sure it will be fixed quickly.