Any update on widening support for ZWave devices in zwavejs?

I’m currently still on ozw beta for my zwave support. It works and my mesh is static so there’s no great pressure to migrate. Also, I can’t at present because my Danfoss 04G0013 rad valves are not currently supoprted by zwavejs.

According to (📢 Announcement: About supporting new device configuration files · Issue #1600 · zwave-js/node-zwave-js · GitHub ), it’s on the (very long) list of devices that were to be added in the next few weeks (as of Feb). Like I said, I’m not pressing to have it supported any time soon but I wondered if there is any update on how the process of adding these many devices is going?

There are quite a few Danfoss devices in the ZwaveJS config (OpenZwave lists the manufacturer id of Danfoss as 0002, should be the same for ZwaveJS). When is the last time you tried it?

EDIT: I believe I found the device you have. Is it a 014G0013? I could not find a 04G0013 anywhere on the internet.

Thanks for finding it (though I’m not convninced this is the 014G0013). Do you know if it supported now? It’s not showing up in the supported device list.

As regards HA, I’m not longer “tinkering” with it. I have a stable environment that just works. As I stated in the OP, I’m in no hurry to migrate, so I have no interest in “trying” to see if it works. I’ll wait until it is supported and then, and only then, I’ll consider migrating - but only if it looks like ozw-beta is coming to the end of it’s life.

What supported devices list are you referring to?

https://devices.zwave-js.io/

This is the OZW device for your radiator:
http://openzwave.com/device-database/0002:0001:8005

Like I posted above, it is a match to the LC-13 device in ZwaveJS.
https://devices.zwave-js.io/?jumpTo=0x0002:0x0005:0x0004:0.0

To me, it looks like a supported device.

Thanks for that.
It’s a shame that whoever put that file in the respoisory didn’t follow the same naming convention as the other files - which were named after the Danfoss product number. It would have saved all this bother. But that’s OSS for you I think.
I daresay ‘LC-13’ meant something to the creator, but not to anybody else :slight_smile: