"Faking" garage door states like closing, opening

You could create automations to set the value of a input_text.
Not very fancy but will work just fine I believe.

@qoheleth my garage motor does stop if it senses any blockage while running, but I don’t think there’s any way for me to get at that data. At least based on the pins I can connect to.

@Hellis81 that could work yes, it has crossed my mind. I want to try a cleaner approach first.

So far I have created my own custom component based on the Cover Template and augmented that to support closing and opening states. That seems to be working.

Only thing left is have it refresh automatically after a configurable set of time. So when state changes to opening or closing I’ll set a timer to update the entity state.

I’ve only recent started using Home Assistant so I’m not entirely sure how these custom components work (nor am I that experienced in Python…). I’ll try to find another component that does something similar (with a timer) and base it off that.

I’ve uploaded my custom cover here

Seems to be working like I wanted.

I run into a similar issue a year ago. I also wanted to use the cover in HomeKit, but turns out the HA cover component, as you said, did not support opening and closing states, only open and closed. I wonder if your implementation, when used with HA HomeKit controller, gives HomeKit opening and closing values. My goal is to implement a fully working HomeKit garage cover integration with a Shelly 2.5 and 2 reeds (or 2 Shelly 1 and 2 reeds) like it’s done with this firmware or via MQTT. This is the one I’m using now and it works great. Two reeds give you real open and closed status and can also give HomeKit a jammed alert if the door does not close in more than X seconds. Let me know what you think.

2 Likes

I think you’d have to make a few changes. IIRC my code assumes 1 reed that’s active for the closed position, and “opening” state is “faked” with a timer (configurable).

So to take advantage of the two reeds there would have to be some changes. You would not need a timer in this case.

Would you be able to share your config utilising this custom cover?

I see one of your issues was solved in Core recently enough (template covers can now support opening/closing states):

It’s cool that was merged. Still not enough to replace my custom cover though.

Here’s my config:

cover:
  - platform: pcc
    covers:
      pcc_garage_door:
        friendly_name: "Garage Door"
        value_template: "{{ is_state('binary_sensor.garage_door_sensor', 'on') }}"
        open_cover:
          service: switch.toggle
          data:
            entity_id: switch.mqtt_garage_door_button
        close_cover:
          service: switch.toggle
          data:
            entity_id: switch.mqtt_garage_door_button
        travelling_time_down: 22
        travelling_time_up: 22
        device_class: "garage"
        unique_id: "pcc_garage_door"
1 Like

I tried to use your repo but HA complained that the manifest had no version key.
More info here:

When you get a chance, it would good if you could add this to your repo.

Thanks

Malcolm

Thanks for mentioning that. I wasn’t aware. I don’t have time to look at this right now, but a Pull Request is welcome.

Edit: Never mind, I just realized it was really just a “version” field. I just added it.

1 Like

Hey man, thanks for the script!! I’d like to use the same setup as yours, I uploaded your custom cover to homeassistant, and used your same config. Still it closes after n° seconds, but when opening it remains “in opening state”.

I tried to create a binary sensor with default close value but still, no luck:

binary_sensor:
  - platform: template
    sensors:
      garage_door_sensor:
        value_template: 'off'

Could you try to take a look at it, please? I opened an issue in your github

Thanks!!

Has anyone using this component upgraded to core-2022.2.x yet?
I’ve hit a problem - logs show the following:

Logger: homeassistant.components.cover
Source: custom_components/pcc/cover.py:152 
Integration: Cover (documentation, issues) 
First occurred: 10:22:50 (1 occurrences) 
Last logged: 10:22:50

Error while setting up pcc platform for cover
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/src/homeassistant/homeassistant/helpers/entity_platform.py", line 249, in _async_setup_platform
    await asyncio.shield(task)
  File "/config/custom_components/pcc/cover.py", line 128, in async_setup_platform
    async_add_entities(await _async_create_entities(hass, config))
  File "/config/custom_components/pcc/cover.py", line 103, in _async_create_entities
    PCCCover(
  File "/config/custom_components/pcc/cover.py", line 152, in __init__
    super().__init__(
TypeError: __init__() missing 1 required positional argument: 'hass'

It’s not obvious how to fix this, because it was working well for me.

It looks like CoverTemplate has changed from the version the code was based on
(https://github.com/home-assistant/core/blob/c41ec6f941252300cb4d0e50cbb2896ff28b95da/homeassistant/components/template/cover.py).
This version has a hass 1st parameter in the super.init. When I modify the pcc cover.py to match , the error goes away and my garage door is back working.

I’ll create an issue on the pcc GitHub for this.

1 Like

I came up with my own solution using 2 magnetic reed switches on a D1 mini and HA’s native cover template.

image

1 Like

Thanks to @pfandrade for the piece of code, it’s working for my Shelly 1 with one reed switch to get away from MyQ.
For the case of opening to open not occurring immediately, I added this automation:

- id: change_garage_door_state

  alias: Change Garage Door State

  trigger:

    - platform: state

      entity_id: cover.garage_door

      to: 'opening'

  action:

    - delay: '00:00:13'

    - service: homeassistant.update_entity

      entity_id:

        - cover.garage_door

Would you mind sharing where you found the garage icons?

See KNX User Forum Icon Set

You can never have too many icons!

I just wish KNX had vacant garage icons to match!

1 Like

Apologies for resurrecting this topic, but is this custom component still a working solution 2.5 years later?

I’ve finally updated my Home Assistant and have also updated the code in the repo to work with the newer versions ( 2023.11.3).

1 Like

This is great, thank you. I’m also running a setup with just one magnetic reed sensor for closed and with your component I’ve got this faking the opening and closing status.

This is the code that I’m using:

cover:
  - platform: pcc
    covers:
      garage_door:
        device_class: garage
        friendly_name: "Garage Door"
        unique_id: garage_door_cover
        # travelling_time_down: 17 #not needed with closed sensor
        travelling_time_up: 15
        value_template: >-
          {{ is_state('binary_sensor.garage_door_garage_door_contact', 'on') }}
        open_cover:
          service: switch.turn_on
          target:
            entity_id: switch.garage_door_trigger
        close_cover:
          service: switch.turn_off
          target:
            entity_id: switch.garage_door_trigger
        stop_cover:
          service: switch.turn_off
          target:
            entity_id: switch.garage_door_trigger

Two things that I’ve noticed:

  • While home assistant is booting, the cover shows as open while binary_sensor.garage_door_garage_door_contact is unavailable. I would have thought the template would return false in that condition.
  • travelling_time_up: 15 seems to override value_template: - I can see this by closing the door shortly after opening it. The state stays as opening for the full 15 seconds, then goes straight to closed.

Great custom component, maybe this can be done with the template platform but I wasn’t able to achieve it - thankyou

For anyone using this in late 2024. ( me, I just started using it. =) )

Noted that when I tried to use it the PCC-entity was not created.
Found in the logs that it had some deprecation warnings and was not thread safe.

Created a pull request that solves these issues and now the entity is created successfully.

Removed SUPPORT_* will be deprecaded in 2025 warning

Note: There is still a unfixed issue when restarting HA that I did not solve (noted in the pull req).