How is it possible that more than 100% of users have their Energy configured?
Yep, I also noticed this number (which is currently at 102%).
I am wondering if there are issues with the numbers reported to Home Assistant Analytics: for instance 75.6% of the instances have the Met.no integration installed (which provides weather data mainly for Scandinavia)
Provides a great weather feed for the UK, FWIW.
If one browses this map that says it’s fed with Met.no data:
Then one might come away with the impression that they provide weather data for everywhere.
So I think 75% installed base is quite plausible.
I collect weather data in HA from a Bresser 5in1 weather sensor. It would be interesting to plot predicted against forecast temperatures.
What on earth is ‘2’ ‘100.94%’ of?
Thanks.I originally thought it might be a local source for meteorological data. While it’s possible that 75% of the installations utilize Met.No, the percentage seems surprisingly high, and that’s what caught my attention.
I don’t remember specifically choosing this weather integration and it wouldn’t have occurred to me to seek out a Norwegian data source. I do have solar panels and the energy dashboard, though. So I think this integration might be suggested/required by other integrations, hence the install base.