Is there a smart way to create an if/then/else automation?

Configuration
1

As I am moving my automations from AppDaemon to native HA (with pyscript for the more complicated ones) I realize that I often have automations where I do something when the state of an entity is on, and something else when it is off.

A typical example is a water leak: when it is on all hell breaks loose (several notifications of several kinds) and when it is off I just send one or two cancellations for persistent ones.

In Python it is simply a case of if/then/else - is there an equivalent in the native automations?

(worst case I will send the info to pyscript and do the conditional actions there)

1 Like
2

Templates (services and data)

1 Like
3

Choose: https://www.home-assistant.io/docs/scripts/#choose-a-group-of-actions

Alternatively jinja templates support if-then-else.

1 Like
4

I have been too slow on just about everything I post today.

2 Likes
5

Thank you very much - this is exactly what I was looking for. I added the code below directly in automations.yaml (as a reference if someone was looking for something similar), but it was also properly rendered in the GUI (in the form of nested blocks - very nice.

- id: 36f2fd76-36dc-4ce6-b168-967b416a96fe
  alias: fuite salle de bain
  trigger:
  - platform: state
    entity_id: binary_sensor.waterleak_sdb_water_leak
  action:
  - choose:
    - conditions:
      - condition: state
        entity_id: binary_sensor.waterleak_sdb_water_leak
        state: 'on'
      sequence:
      - service: notify.gotify_alert
        data:
          message: fuite salle de bain
      - service: mqtt.publish
        data:
          topic: alert
          payload: fuite salle de bain
    - conditions:
      - condition: state
        entity_id: binary_sensor.waterleak_sdb_water_leak
        state: 'off'
      sequence:
      - service: mqtt.publish
        data:
          topic: alert
          payload: ''
  mode: single
6

If you wish, you can streamline your automation like this:

- id: 36f2fd76-36dc-4ce6-b168-967b416a96fe
  alias: fuite salle de bain
  trigger:
  - platform: state
    entity_id: binary_sensor.waterleak_sdb_water_leak
  action:
  - choose:
    - conditions: "{{ trigger.to_state.state == 'on' }}"
      sequence:
      - service: notify.gotify_alert
        data:
          message: fuite salle de bain
    default:
    - service: mqtt.publish
      data:
        topic: alert
        payload: "{{ 'fuite salle de bain' if trigger.to_state.state == 'on' else '' }}"
  mode: single

Or like this:

- id: 36f2fd76-36dc-4ce6-b168-967b416a96fe
  alias: fuite salle de bain
  variables:
    msg: 'fuite salle de bain'
  trigger:
  - platform: state
    entity_id: binary_sensor.waterleak_sdb_water_leak
  action:
  - choose:
    - conditions: "{{ trigger.to_state.state == 'on' }}"
      sequence:
      - service: notify.gotify_alert
        data:
          message: "{{ msg }}"
    default:
    - service: mqtt.publish
      data:
        topic: alert
        payload: "{{ msg if trigger.to_state.state == 'on' else '' }}"
  mode: single
7

In pyscript, I do it like this:

trigger = 'input_boolean.test_1 == "on"'  # or something much more complicated

@state_trigger(trigger)
def when_it_is_on():
  pass

@state_trigger(f"not ({trigger})")
def when_it_is_off():
  pass

Obviously, for very simple “on” or “off” type situations it’s more readable to just write the whole trigger in state_trigger. But if your trigger gets complex, just negating it with “not” can handle both sides. There are other ways, of course, but I find this to be the cleanest for most cases.

2 Likes