Would it be possible on the Bluetooth Proxy Installers web page, to treat the M5Stack AtomU device the same as Atom Lite? I tried plugging in AtomU, and it tries to install as “Generic ESP32”. But the AtomU is identical to the Atom Lite for pin usage, board name, etc. (Well, AtomU has additional facilities, but that shouldn’t matter.)
That could be really slick way to get a Bluetooth Proxy online: flash an AtomU with Bluetooth Proxy code, plug the AtomU into a USB phone charger, and plug that into a wall outlet. No wires, no nothing --just flash, plug, plug, and you’ve got Bluetooth capabilities.
Yep, I have indeed flashed my own into ESPHome. But also still think it would be slickest for the general user if it just flashed Atom Lite code when presented with an M5Stack AtomU device.
That would be totally the quickest way to get a BT Proxy up & running:
Plug AtomU device into computer USB port (USB-A)
Point browser to BT Proxy Installer web page, & follow the prompts.
Unplug the AtomU from the computer, & plug it into a USB wall wart, then plug that into the wall outlet.
True. I flashed the Atom Lite code into an AtomU. I just think it would be good if the BT Proxy Installer web page would do that, instead of flashing “Generic ESP” into the AtomU. But yeah, only difference I noticed is that Atom Lite YAML enables the on-board button, whereas Generic ESP YAML does not.
Oh you’re right. I thought I remembered the Atom one as enabling the on-board physical pushbutton (i.e., a binary_sensor on a GPIO pin). But yeah, no such. Sorry for introducing the confusion.
hello… I’m somewhat new to esphome devices.
I have a Atom Lite and a Atom U (usb-A).
I’m curious what I could add to the yaml code to re-enable the Led on the device to act as a status indicator?