Yes I would like to offer what the Unifi_gateway integration offers, its all about time…
Yes, I’ve been playing with control of WiFi before, the infrastructure in the library has been prepared to do that.
1 Like
This is not only about entities, it’s about devices. I don’t see why an ESPHome device should show up ALSO as an Unifi device, especially when it’s not an Unifi device!
Yes, and I have this. But after a period of time, I have over 5000 entities. And sometimes the integration stops working. I can’t find any logs about this. But when removing the integration it starts with 120 entites and it doesn’t stop.
I btw think this is because of my docker installation, which creates new MAC addresses pretty often. These are registered in Unifi as clients, but don’t do anything. Have no function what so ever. This is why i’d like to select the entities which get added to my integration.
I just went into the entities page, sorted by integration and selected all the device trackers and disabled them all, then went and enabled the few I needed
EDIT: I think you mean devices not entities, sorry
A device registry entry describes a physical device, it can be linked to multiple entities and multiple integrations.
Device tracker entities will only be created if another entity has already registered a device registry entry, be it from a different entity from UniFi platform or from another integration.
If no entry exist then no device tracker entity gets created.
Heads up! Release 2.4.27 is now available as a stable release. I haven’t heard anyone running it with the integration but I run only the stable release so I have not verified any functionality.
Note: Any 3rd party modifications made to the OS of the console will be lost after the upgrade, proceed with caution if you modified your console’s OS.
IMPORTANT: Any 3rd party modifications or integrations (Home Assistant/“Poller”) can cause unexpected issues during or after the upgrade process. We recommend to completely remove/disable these integrations when performing the upgrade.
1 Like
I’ve had 2.4.27 EA running for a few weeks now with no issues, I didn’t see that note and it installed fine with HA running
1 Like
That’s good. Thanks
I’m pretty sure that’s not correct.
A device tracker entity gets created no matter what but it will only get automatically enabled if the client MAC address is associated with another integration.
for example, if the MAC address is associated with the ESPHome integration the device tracker entity gets created and automatically enabled but for a phone that has no other related integration the device tracker entity gets created but it stays disabled until the user enables it.
On another note has anything been looked at about the automatic removal of clients which have been removed (forgotten) from the Unifi controller?
That is still an issue for my integration. I had brought it up before but you had mentioned that some refactoring was going on so I was just wondering if that was on the timeline.
1 Like
This is exactly my experience too.
For me automatic removal would be great!
But in my case it’s not only device_tracker entities that get created, I get entire devices listed under the Unifi integration just like the access points (see picture above). This surely isn’t expected.
Also, it only happens with ESPHome devices and, after disabling the creation of new devices in the Unifi integration, only with those that were already there. I suppose this must be some short-circuit during the creation of the device_trackers.
That would be some kind of service to clean up old entities perhaps. Nothing planned right now.
Yes the refactoring is not done yet, from a platform perspective the network client device trackers are left and then how to handle updated options. So not much left before the refactoring is done unless Ive forgotten any details 
1 Like
Read this UniFi Network integration - official thread - #41 by Robban
Device entries represent a physical device can be referred to by entities from multiple integrations at the same time. The Device entry does not become a “UniFi device”.
Ok, poor formulation, the tracker entity is not enabled automatically which was the behaviour prior to 2022.1.
1 Like
Well, this is the situation whether you believe it or not and it does not make any sense. No other integration lists among its devices also the devices of other integrations just because they both record an IP address.
What is the point, other than bloating the interface with useless (and plain wrong) information, to show a device twice? If I see that the esphome integration has 38 devices and the Unifi integration has 42 devices, I’d think I have 80 devices when there’s really only 42 (38 Esphome and 4 APs).
Furthermore, only ESPhome devices get picked up, no Toon, no Wallbox, no IP cameras… they all have an IP and are visible by Unifi…
Read this Device Registry | Home Assistant Developer Docs
It’s not about mapping devices that report the same IP adress. The mapping is done when they both report matching serial numbers (MAC).
This is how it is supposed to work. Entities are unique resources whereas devices are a shared resource.
Unifi and esphome integrations are doing it properly. I looked at the toon integration and it doesn’t seem to declare the serial number of the device and can thus not be mapped to the same entry as unifi. I can’t say for your other integrations as I don’t know which they are.
I disagree this is as it should be, for 2 reasons. First, ESPhome does not list its devices as being also Unifi. Therefore only the Unifi integration shows this behaviour.
Secondly if I disable the “enable new entities” from the unifi menu, it will stop listing further devices found. Therefore this behaviour, as proper as it can be, can be disabled and it’s not mandatory. In fact, I only have 14 ESPhome devices (out of 20) showing up also in Unifi, because they were already there when I installed the Unifi integration. The others were not added as Unifi devices precisely because I disabled the option before adding them too.
For as much as I can think, I cannot find an use for having the same device show up in 2 different places.
All I am asking is that either the option is disabled by default at installation, leaving the decision to bloat one’s interface to the user, or that previously found devices can be removed from the Unifi integration.
Feel free to write up an issue on hass core GitHub detailing what you see as wrongful behaviour and how it should actually be.
Hello all!
Here comes a release note for Home Assistant 2023.3.0.
Nearly no action from me at all on the Home Assistant front, new role at work has left me brain drained in the evening 
, hoping to be back doing stuff shortly as I get more into it.
I’ve gotten requests to buy me a coffee, I’m on Github Sponsors if you appreciate my work.
Cheers!
/Robban
For feature requests of the integration post an issue at aiounifi github
1 Like