I’ve searched the forum, but couldn’t find anything regarding these new US state laws in California (AB 1043) and Colorado which will mean that every operating system needs to have age verification and an API to check age.
After the uproar in the Linux communities about these laws, I was wondering what this will mean for HAOS, since Nabu Casa is California based. Will it mean that future development of HA and HAOS will comply to these laws and that it will also affect the privacy and freedom of people outside these states and the US?
4 Likes
Afaik nabu casa isn’t involved in HaOS development, releasing or distributing 
Nabu Casa offers Home Assistant Cloud, a subscription service that provides remote access, voice assistant integration, backup and restore, and more
But to provide this service they surely need to run some ■■ on their servers… 
When I ask Brave it comes back with what I assumed:
The company exists specifically to further develop Home Assistant, ESPHome, and other projects that support the Open Home vision. Nabu Casa employees contribute directly to Home Assistant’s core codebase, working on foundational improvements like installation, management, accessibility, and system architecture. They also drive key initiatives such as the development of the Home Assistant Assist voice assistant , Z-Wave JS , and the Year of the Voice project. Their funding model—through subscriptions to Home Assistant Cloud—ensures that core developers are paid, enabling continuous innovation and long-term sustainability for the open-source project. As stated on their website. We are committed to improving Home Assistant, also for people who are not customers of Nabu Casa, Inc.
AI Slop? 
In your quote I do not once read HaOS 
Regardless whether Nabu Casa, with their owners and staff having a strong involvement in Open Foundation, HA software and hardware, is involved with HAOS my question remains whether the developers of HAOS are considering to comply with these new laws and what that will mean for us users.
The ink for the law is not dry yet and it will not go in to effect until 2027- as written. Governor Newsom explicitly called for follow-up work in the 2026 session to address identified issues and reduce unintended impacts. So the law is likely to get narrowed before the January 1, 2027 effective date.
Something I think that will be material is that no matter how you deploy it, HA’s house is built on a Linux foundation; the changes proposed would likely be driven from there.
1 Like
I think the 
. and foremost question you should ask: Is (at this very moment) the law applicable at all. The short answer is probably (simply) no
Wait if the law is active, applicale and read the version that will be published then. 
Then go back ask question
!reminder 2030 
I don’t think it will apply to Servers. It’s the OS of the device the user is holding that must apply.
A lot of assumptions in the reactions. Read the law; it says operating systems and doesn’t exclude anything, not even servers. So, it will even affect your smart fridge and smart lawn mower as it has been written. Even though there have been remarks made by the governor about “some extra work needed”, he signed the law after it passed state legislation bodies last year and it will be active next January 1st.
I understand it’s a stupid law made by people that don’t understand anything, but that doesn’t mean it did not pass nor has been signed, so it’s something people who distribute an OS have to deal with, hence my question in development for the developers of the OS.
Just a disclaimer like ‘this software may not be used in California and Colorado’ and problem solved 