WTH is it so hard to control how old entity data is treated when you rename an entity?

[Ildar_Gabdullin]

OK, then how you can explain this gap:

and another entity_id (renamed) filled DB within this gap.

@petro

There’s a separate table that stores the entity_id in relation to the metadata key. So when you update the entity_id, the relation is just updated and nothing in the history changes.

This is probably how it is supposed to work, otherwise there is no need to use metadata_id as a key. But in fact i got this:

More description was provided here.

These are tests with 2024.12.
If it was changed - then it happened recently.