Thanks,
Added the two lines:
console.log(this._config.config);
console.log(cardConfig);
But didnât increase any âlogging levelâ in the console
As I said above, likely a bug on lists
It can be, I am working with multiple objects inside âconfigâ
Also the temperature one was â- typeâ
Checking
Yes sorry, writing during tests so I didnât scroll all the way down before hitting âReplyâ 
1 Like
haha probably! I donât see a use for it yet but Iâve only glanced at the git page. If I can leverage this to simplify conditional cards, then that will be a great benefit. Iâm gonna look into that when I get home.
Iâll check it out tonight, but pretty much need another conditional checking if it is an array, and if so handle the array as a whole before applying back to the key value
So I think youâre right, that might be the issue, because now I changed the temperature one to this code:
- type: custom:config-template-card
config:
type: custom:mini-graph-card
name: Outside
icon: "${this.hass.states['sensor.dark_sky_temperature'].state >= 10 ? 'mdi:thermometer-chevron-up' : 'mdi:thermometer-chevron-down'}"
# icon: mdi:thermometer
more_info: false
group: false
entities:
- sensor.dark_sky_temperature
hour24: true
show:
graph: false
icon: true
extrema: true
fill: false
align_state: center
And in the console I see something new (it doesnât work still, but still itâs something different)
config-template-card.js?track=true:1838 Uncaught (in promise) RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded
at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)
at HTMLElement._evaluateConfig (config-template-card.js?track=true:2311)
at Object.entries.forEach.entry (config-template-card.js?track=true:2315)
at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)
at HTMLElement._evaluateConfig (config-template-card.js?track=true:2311)
at Object.entries.forEach.entry (config-template-card.js?track=true:2315)
at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)
at HTMLElement._evaluateConfig (config-template-card.js?track=true:2311)
at Object.entries.forEach.entry (config-template-card.js?track=true:2315)
at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)
Infinite loopâŚ
perfectionâŚ
@iantrich Would you be willing to post a run down of what is needed to compile this? Iâm thinking of contributing, but Iâve not yet compiled any typescript stuff for HA.
Thanks
npm install or yarn install
npm run rollup
That was disturbingly easy. I should have figured that out myself. Thanks!
1 Like
hehe
Side note, this is still not working even if I donât use a list
- type: custom:config-template-cardx
config:
type: entities
title: House Members
show_header_toggle: false
entities:
- entity: person.andrea
type: "custom:secondaryinfo-entity-row"
secondary_info: "${this.hass.states['binary_sensor.andrea_oneplus5_charging'].state === 'true' ? 'Charging' : 'Not Charging'}"
I am wondering if there is also something that doesnât work with the way that the âcustom:secondaryinfo-entity-rowâ works
entities is a list
Fair enough, I tought you were referring to list of cards only 
Would something like the following work assuming the lists thing is fixed?
- type: custom:config-template-card
config:
type: vertical-stack
cards: "${js_loop_thing_to_build_list_of_child_cards_with_more_templating()}"
I donât need examples or anything (yet). Just a simple yes/no/maybe with some hackery would suffice. Wondering if itâs worth the time installing and figuring out the necessary JS to even attempt it.
1 Like
itâs pretty open-ended. Only thing to consider is that youâll need to return a list in your case, not a single object. I havenât played around with returning a list at all. The bug is in iterating over a list.
thanks for the pointer!
and yes, I strongly hope we can use templating in the regular cards, hope this will be implemented, sooner than later.
All custom cards are very nice, but when something odd happens we are always warned by the Devs we shouldnât use custom ui or cards, because no official HA codeâŚ
that being said, I will most certainly check this card, and the possibilities it holds.
uhhh what devs are telling you to not use custom cardsâŚ? youâve been told wrong, especially as the core team of devs on the front-end all produce a lot of custom cards
yes, I knowâŚand its a bit of a surprise indeed.
Before, in regular HA, when we used a custom components, we where warned not to complain or file issues for regular HA when using custom cards. As stung by wasps sometimesâŚ
We did of course, even when using perfectly fine custom components like variable, or hue.
Now Lovelace is being pushed as the default, in its still immature state, all of a sudden all of these custom cards tumble over each other, fixing, or should I say filling in what the core cards donât offer (yet).
Not sure what to make of that. I for one am very careful building a full Lovelace interface on custom cards mainly, as many of us here do. I very much like the looks of it, but since LL takes a lot of the system, and because of that one of my main components (Hue) is being tackled often, I hold back just yet.
Of course I have a LL setup, try to keep up as much as I can. But for me templating the interface is really important, and thatâs where LL seriously lacks ( in the official cards that is).
This new Templatable card could be an improvement on that, though I much prefer to see LL embrace templating in its core.
1 Like