I had that during the beta, and it appeared to be because I was missing the --privileged option in my docker run command. Adding that allowed it to work.
updated in hoping to finally migrate to zwave-js with little configuration issues and manual changes required ā¦ FAR FROM IT ā¦ I stopped counting after 91 entities that could not be migrated ā¦ I honestly hoped this would be easier/better ā¦ restoring backup as I type this ā¦
Frankly it is a good release if you arenāt a tuya user. May I remind tuya users, and cloud users in general: you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas.
I know you may have been told youād get local control, but donāt buy technology based on promises of future features.
FWIW, I am a Tuya user and have had no issues with this update. I was using Tuya V2. I removed v2, updated, added the new core integration and everything worked exactly as it did before.
I am thankful for everyoneās work on HA, as always. On the other hand, it seems unbelievable to me that we are celebrating this Tuya integration as if it would be some sort of improvement.
Not all devices supported, having to renew the API subscription ever year, etc.
This goes against everything one wants from a smart home solution, eg. making your life easier, not harder. Decreasing chores and maintenance, not increasing them.
My observation or suggestion is more along the lines of not allowing any manufacturer to come up with an integration like this one, for example, having to āpurchaseā and renew an API, and forbid local control.
HA is becoming one of the de facto solutions for integrating these smart products together, and I am wondering what would happen if these types of integrations would not be celebrated/allowed in HA. Maybe they would be forced to come up with solutions making more sense? Would HA and the community have the political ammo to just say no to these? I believe the answer is yes.
Another good example for this is the official eWeLink integration, which, in my opinion, also went a little sideways and makes zero sense in itās current form.
I see were now just started retagging github issues from integration:tuya to integration:tuya_v2
How are the poor Tuya users to know the V2 in hacs isnt the V2 in HA, Everyone thought they would be the same, they seem now to be referenced by the same name yet are different.
i also note not one job has been responded to by any Tuya Dev
We are a very small percentage of the Tuya customer base. We dont have that much leverage. The fact that they are willing to work with the Home Assistant team is amazing.
The negativity here seems to mostly be stemming from frustration with the early stage of continued development and not comprehending the instructions.
Well I havenāt seen anyone from Tuya or HA for that matter trying to help people comprehend the instructions.
For a officially built and supported integration by a vendor, the support from them, is well terrible.
So upgraded knowing my tuya thermostat was going mess up and it has, 15C is reported as 3C and 20C reported as 4C.
I can automate the temp so it isnāt the end of the world, then used a range node to a new entity so I can at least see what it is set to properly in lovelace.
Looking at the API there is a scale setting which I can see but canāt change so Iām guessing the smartlife app must be able to use the scale setting so it looks correct in the APP.
Iām pretty sure the new API isnāt pulling the current temp anymore either, just the target temp.
Other then the tuya bits upgrade went well as always.
I updated through the versions to 2021.10.2. The Pentair Screenlogic integration is broken on all 2021.10.X versions. Went back to core-2021.9.7 and everything is working again. What is the best way to report this issue?
THX