From the first moment the new logo do not recall a house. Its asymmetric tree, having no enough space around, makes the house looking “unstable”, leaning alike.
This hits eyes from very first moment and it’s the major flaw of this new creation.
New font is as OK as previous one. The color change is too small to be noticeable. It needs A/B comp to be seen.
Recently I can see a lot of brands refreshing their logotypes. Not sure why, but I understand 50+ years old ones might require that.
In our case it seems like the change for a change itself. Even reasoning is weak. The motivation for 3-node antenna almost killed me. I believe it wouldn’t be hard to make up arguments for different number of nodes.
TBH I would like to read about real motivation for this change. To learn about initial needs, instead of post-factum reasoning.