Precisely…and the direction has become 100% non-negotiable with the user-base IMHO.
Then again I have been known to be naive at times? It seems like a lot of others here may share my naivety and as a result we have beefed up our forum policy and started to censor any views that are not shared by the few!
We have git for versioning. Other than that, it rather put time into improve the current state of the docs. 
I fail to see how having a revision number and date adds much time? It is just a discipline that most commercial companies mandate. In any case I do appreciate the great work by you and the team.
Maybe you could see @flamingm0e first answer as a personal attack due to “discussions with you being fruitless” , but the capitalization was in no way a personal attack. And I can’t see why the second response, (which got unflagged now) would have been a personal attack in any way.
But thanks for opening my eyes, I’ll now also stop posting here, I don’t want to be in a community where people get treated like this. I know you couldn’t care less, but the other 100’s of people I helped here in the community may care…
It maybe linked but I believe that a released document must have this information. It is called quality control. No company I every worked at allowed anything less. In any case it looks like it is a dead issue.
I agreed with you that it would be helpful to have a date or revision number in the docs.
That I have agreed on in the past. Showing things like git revision or date last changed is doable and would be helpful.
How do we implement this? Where can I file that suggestion on github? Would it be an architecture issue?
Feature requests go into the forums here, we have a feature request section 
There is Microsoft Office and there is MacOs Office. They both have the same intention but they look and feel different.
Why can’t we have Raspberry Pi HA, Docker HA, MacOS HA, etc?
Does this help? maybe. If we split up documentation/forum
Looking for Supervisor? It’s default on Raspberry PI HA and it is absent on others (these lines are just an example)
So in a forum the topic starts with the version;
RPHA: installing HACS
DHA; how to operate Sonoff
MHA; where are my backups?
You see, once we all get yoused to this it is clear where to search for things
There could also be a GHA (General Home Assistant) category
GHA: I installed RPHA and MHA yet both installations end up with different results (lovelace and yaml wise) <- this one in fact is true.
It is just an idea…
Because installing hacs is the same on any version, as is using sonoff.
I used it as an example
ALLHA - installing HACS
Simple ‘solution’
No.
Why do I see this kind of request so often?
No thread should ever be closed because someone decides it is no longer useful.
(Note careful restraint, so as not to use any emphasis - I have no idea now when it is appropriate)
If you don’t like where this conversation is going simply stop reading it. But if you wanna close it just go ahead. It will simply make my point even more clear.
That would be 9O% of the post. Once home assistant is installed, for configuration, creating automation s etc there is little difference. It is mostly with errors we have to ask “how did you install HA”?
Yep
You’ve got a great point here. In the other hand; it doesn’t cause pain to put your installation method in a post either.
But I will leave this topic and continue my configuration adventures
All the best
I can’t vote…
Home Assistant Supervised here.
Why not leave the poll open if you want a larger sample?
HassOS