new cp user i believe, it needs offcourse arming rights
are you running on RPI? maybe thats the issue why the addon doesnt work
see here : Risco alarm system - #31 by spurn_hail
creds to @spurn_hail
1 Like
yes i’m running on rpi… i posted the message there 
So for now, im stuck to cloud
I created a cp user, with user rights
I have a pin, but no emailadres or password.
If i want to add the integration now, i need to enter email and password (and pin but that i have)
Now what? Something is not right there: )
no idea, long time ago i used that integration 
if i remember correctly, i just entered indeed that email/pass/pin , and then the entities were being created automaticly
yeah but i dont now what email / pass /pin, cause the user doesnt have one (only pin)
you need to create the user on www.riscocloud.com , there you can give it an email/pass
or just just your own credentials, doesnt mather
Yeah i am creating it there, but theres no field for the email / pass
I tried “master” cp user now, and still no email/pass
seems i created regular users , not cp users
1 Like
ok think i found it
Edit: Succeeded with normal user
Now waiting for local version for RPI
1 Like
Wait no more.
Copy this directory:
to addons (local addons storage) and replace Dockerfile’s content with:
FROM swiergot/risco-mqtt-local:v0.4.2
ENV RISCO_MQTT_HA_CONFIG_FILE="/config/risco-mqtt.json"
Then go to the Supervisor, refresh addons and install.
Works for me on RPi 3B+.
1 Like
Addon compatibility for arm64 arch has been added in 0.5.0-beta.1
Some people already confirmed it is working.
3 Likes
Loveley, will try, thank you so much !
Got it working in proxy mode on my RPI3b+, wonderful!
Are there any setbacks from using proxy opposed to the direct connection?
Couldn’t get it to connect via direct mode, so tried proxy and worked like a charm. So, if either of these offer the same functionality, I will leave it like this for now
Are you planning to provide builds for 32-bit too?
Could be. Which architecture exactly ?
If you can open a feature request here please : Issues · vanackej/risco-mqtt-local · GitHub
ARMv7, just like this one I have built for myself:
I will open a feature request.
EDIT: https://github.com/vanackej/risco-mqtt-local/issues/49
Released in 0.5.0-beta.2
Proxy mode can be very unstable, because it relies on both panel and risco cloud. It’s very complex to maintain the state of all connections synchronized and is much more likely to have stability issues.
The other problem is that I don’t use this mode, so I’m totally unable to reproduce issues and investigate.
1 Like