Seems to be a generous guy, but a little strange. But who isnāt?
Anyway, Valetudo is a cool software, and fortunately it is well maintained. Maybe heās on a nerd level way above us.
Seems to be a generous guy, but a little strange. But who isnāt?
Anyway, Valetudo is a cool software, and fortunately it is well maintained. Maybe heās on a nerd level way above us.
I imagine it would get quite frustrating dealing with demands by users for such a popular project. You only have to look at this quote he has on his github home page:
Running a successful open source project is just Good Will Hunting in reverse, where you start out as a respected genius and end up being a janitor who gets into fights. - Byrne Hobart
Still, no excuse for deleting well constructed issue reports without comment.
Why do I get the feeling I know that from somewhereā¦
I think this is to be discuss with HA, as per, ā¦Valetudo comes as it is and donāt get me wrong, apparently the guys from HA core are much more cooperative and probably there we can work out a more practical solution.
In the end once again the errors are coming from the MQTT integration. That was an Error in the pastā¦ so this mean there is to understand how MQTT.sensors can actually receiveā¦ a different value that isnāt binary (what exposed functions are available). Rand256 has also some āissuesā with deprecated schemas and actually not support many new types and only one vendor.
Not according to the HA team:
Yes according to them it soā¦ again, I will test also this option and see if it fixās the problemās, if not I think I should re-discuss the issue.
I know it is a kind of odd. And honestly I hope is clear that Iām trying to understand the phenomenon so that, we can together discuss it, either with the core guys or with Valetudo guys.
For the time be I take the responsibility for it. This is why I felt right to open an issue for it on my sideā¦
Obviously as per, it is mentioned in that comment, nothing has changed but later on MQTT Exception raised while updating state of sensor BatteryStateAttribute/level' with payload: b'88' Ā· Issue #118629 Ā· home-assistant/core Ā· GitHub
There was some changes on the sensors, this is what Iām talking about now.
@tom_l I changed significantly the connector and I will observe it for a couple of days to see if there is still ābinaryā conversions error.
I did also commented, on the āclosedā issue in HA, as per, either the casesā¦ Binary (None Encoding as it was before, or DEFAULT_ENCODING) or Strings the values are just Subscribedā¦ so why MQTT.sensor is raising the warning when the Camera do not publish Sensors data?
Hopefully, this changes on the Camera code, will solve this warnings this is all that matters in the end
Let me know if you want me to test it. Though I think I have the same model vacuum as you (S5).
Thanks will do Iām still working on a couple of things, and I guess will release a couple of betaās next week. I need to wait for the HA betas as well before to release the 2024.08.0.
@tom_l and @paddy0174 I did release the 2024.08.0b0 that included the fix for the binary data and some improvements on the snapshots. Hope you guys are willing to test this pre-release and please do not hesitate to open an issue when facing problems.
Thanks! I for one am willing, but not able to for a few daysā¦ My āElseā1 isnāt available, I needed to unplug her: Weāre painting the walls and ceiling, and she wasnāt very helpful in the beginning
But I promise, I will do after the coming weekend!
1 I named my vacuum after a famous german TV janitor, āElse Klingā. She played the janitor in a TV series (Lindenstrasse), that ran for 35 years. Thought that would be appropriate. Donāt tell me, you havenāt named your vacuum robotā¦
Installed. Will let you Know how it goes after my scheduled vacuum later today.
Well honestlyā¦ I guess each one renamed the vacuums, had cool ideas for that. I found the names that they get with the firmwares quite interesting. The āV1ā is Silent Tepid Stinkbug, and the āS5ā Glossy Hard to Found Narwhal, quite original names I need to sayā¦ looks interesting so. āStinkbugā and āNarwhalā, will probably be them after I will change the flat/town later this summer, indeed is cool to give them a little personality and if there is a background is even better
I added large googly-eyes and moustache stickers to my two, but I have not named them.
Good news, no binary mqtt message warnings!
Super then we solved the problem in the end it was the decoding of the payload as I wrote earlier. So just few new adjustments and when Home Assistant 2024.8.0 come out and we can test the Camera with the beta releases we should be able to release the 2024.08.0. As there are issues for the guys using one vacuum on multi floors (using maploader) I will add an option to create the pre-loaded trims file or not, this means old way reload (warning can occur) or new stile with pre-loaded trims (no warnings) will be selectable.
Edit: I would need also to re-flash the S5 with Rand256 to make sure that also this firmware works this is also why this will take time
The version 2024.08.0 of the Camera will be fully packed and include the āreset_trimsā service as well a Camera āreloadā Service. It also fixes from the tests done the binary data conversion issues faced in the new versions of Home Assistant (due to an update miss interpretation from my side of the new decoding specs of MQTT).
As per there was several changes in the last month, and I couldnāt honestly fully test the Rand256, the robot just now booted with Rand and hopefully 2024.08.0 will also correct the issues that are facing up since the 2024.07.x versions of the Camera.
Note that to beta test the Camera your Home Assistant should be min. 2024.8.0b0.
This are new āActionsā that are now available with the version 2024.08.0 of our Camera. The reset_trims action is the one that will automatically reset the images trims (when you for example reset/change the vacuums maps) and reload the Camera automatically.
We got also Rand256 to work again, and once again sorry for taking so long
Pillow dependencies are right now a little on the large, but this give the possibility to the users that will not update HA to still run our updates. The aim is to keep it woking and improving it not forcing anyone in the endā¦ ānever touch a running systemā is the role one
No more binary Warning / conversions errors from MQTT with this new version.
Thank-you very much for making this integration.
I have a query on the āactionā/service for resetting image trims - will this carry-out/run the same task as the āReset Map Trimsā option under the advanced options?
The reason I ask is because Iām using the valetudo map-loader (GitHub - pkoehlers/maploader: Map loader for Dreame robot vacuums running Valetudo) addon to switch valetudo maps so that I can move the robot from one floor to another in my home. When I reload the vacuum camera, the vacuum map is trimmed/clipped and only part of it shows. If I use the āReset Map Trimsā option, this fixes it. So, it would be great to have that available as a service/āactionā if thatās possible
@FireCheetah you are really welcome, yes in theory it should do the same. There is although some issue right now ā it looks it isnāt working as expected. I will do my best to make it fully functional on the 2024.08.1 next week. There is a discussion on the Camera GitHub page that can give you more details of it.
reset_trims āActionā is design to do the same operations required for āReset Map Trimsā including reload the camera. In the case you use only one vacuum this should work. Mainly I noticed that sometimes the reload fails, but as I stated above I will make sure it woks in full by next week.
@FireCheetah I just released the version 2024.08.1 that fixes a couple of thinks on the āActionsā.
With this version the āspecificationsā for the Actions are now fixed.
action: mqtt_vacuum_camera.reset_trims
data: {}
Those changes ensures that when needed also using map-loader is possible to configure a script to manage those scenarios, and the Camera should render the maps correctly.
Another point, is that the auto_crop data will be written only when the vacuum is ādockedā.
For those that didnāt yet update the camera the version compatible with Home Assistant 2024.8.x is >= 2024.08.0. If you are running the Camera version 2024.06.3 or earlier, please do not hesitate to let me know, but in generalā¦
If you do not want to use / canāt use the 2024.06.4 to migrateā¦ some other users had just updated the HACS url for the repository and manually setup the Camera, you off course would need to remove the Valetudo_Vacuum_Camera once you are done (this is automatically done with the 2024.06.4 migration procedure).