SSL access via my DuckDNS hostname also failed after 6.1 update (6.0 is fine). I am using some port redirect on my firewall to allow outside access and I also use the external name (duckdns.org) on the LAN. This worked fine in 2023.6.0 but not in 6.1. I restored from 6.1 to 6.0 and it works again. Access to https://my.lan.ip:8123 still worked.
I’m not using the DuckDNS addon, only LetsEncrypt (I update my external IP to DuckDNS from my Firewall).
I am not trolling I’m replying to posts that I consider trolling. It’s the same every month. You don’t raise issues when you find them and complain about it like it’s being done on purpose to make your life miserable. I’m trying to get you to just create the issues without the unnecessary complaining. That’s it
And the new “command_line” platform supports only the “bottom way”.
Do not find it consistent. This issue was closed by developer, said smth like “it was discussed & agreed” (addressed to this topic).
Nobody said this is a bug.
There is difference between “wrong” & “inconsistent”.
As I already said, the issue was created since there is no Discussions in “core” section. Now I think that I should create a Discussion in a “architecture” section. Finally, I was addressed to a dedicated discussion.
Seems that this also broke automations where MQTT is used as a trigger, or at least that is what I can gather from the very vague error message
The mqtt platform for the switch integration does not support platform setup
I’ve already switched over to the new format for all my MQTT devices, but the old format is still used inside of automations. Is this no longer supported either?
this how I have it setup at the moment
automation:
- id: ai_trigger_person_in_backyard
alias: AI trigger person in backyard
trigger:
- platform: mqtt
topic: "BlueIris/backyard/Status"
Mine is working without a password. Here is my share from Samba:
[backups]
comment = Backups folder
path = /media/steve/7f9b413a-a874-7e48-9d1d-e9cb6beb0654/backups
create mask=0777
directory mask=0777
read only = no
browsable = yes
guest ok = yes
force group = steve
force user = steve
You know what, you are completely right not sure how I missed it but indeed I did. I was so ready to say no I didn’t but of course before doing something stupid like that went through all of it again to make sure I was right, and I wasn’t.
I think I got stuck on the new fancy UI and somehow expected all the MQTT devices to show up there but of course they wouldn’t if they are only used in templates
Interesting. I don’t have force group/user in my Samba share and it’s a media server so it’s read only. HA complained about authorization when I tried guest without a password and I assumed it required a password because all my other mounts to my share are via passwordless guest. I’ll need to play around with this.